Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: Who deserves the most credit for taking down ISIS?
1. Summary of the results
The defeat of ISIS cannot be attributed to a single actor or administration. Recent data shows continued active engagement against ISIS, with USCENTCOM conducting 95 missions resulting in 163 terrorists killed and 33 captured [1]. The fight remains ongoing, as evidenced by ISIS claiming 153 attacks in Iraq and Syria in early 2024 [2].
The most significant contributions came from:
- U.S. Military and Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) who played critical roles in operations like killing ISIS leader Abu Ibrahim al-Qurayshi [3]
- Obama Administration during which approximately 2/3 to 3/4 of airstrikes and territorial losses occurred [4]
- Trump Administration which saw about 50% of ISIS territorial losses in 2017 alone [5]
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
Several crucial contextual elements are often overlooked:
- While military victories are significant, experts emphasize that a comprehensive strategy addressing root causes is necessary for lasting defeat [3]
- ISIS, though territorially diminished, continues to operate as an insurgency in some regions [6]
- The transition between administrations was more continuous than often portrayed - Trump largely built upon and resourced Obama's existing strategy rather than creating a new approach [6]
- Recent data shows ISIS remains active, with their attacks potentially doubling their 2023 total [2]
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The question itself promotes a potentially misleading narrative by suggesting there's a single actor deserving primary credit. This benefits:
- Political figures like Trump who claim full credit for defeating ISIS, despite evidence showing the campaign spanned multiple administrations [4]
- Military leadership who might emphasize recent victories while downplaying ongoing challenges
- Current administration officials who benefit from highlighting recent successes, such as the 196 Defeat ISIS missions conducted in early 2024 [2]
It's crucial to understand that the fight against ISIS has been a continuous, multi-administration effort involving numerous international partners [7], rather than the achievement of any single actor or timeframe.