Israeli defense force killing Palestinians
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Israeli military operations in Gaza and the occupied West Bank have resulted in very high Palestinian fatalities, with multiple independent and media analyses finding a majority of those killed to be civilians; a Guardian analysis of classified Israeli military data reported civilians accounted for roughly five of six deaths in Gaza as of May 2025 [1]. Israeli authorities say they aim to avoid civilian harm and contend many victims are combatants embedded in civilian areas, a claim reflected in military tallies that report large numbers of militants killed [2], but human-rights groups, U.N. bodies and forensic monitors have repeatedly raised concerns about proportionality, collective punishment and inadequate accountability [3] [4].
1. What the casualty data show and where it comes from
Multiple data sets and investigative reports put Palestinian deaths in the tens of thousands during the campaigns that followed October 7, 2023, with Gaza Ministry of Health and monitoring organizations producing the most-cited totals [5] [3], while independent analyses indicate unusually high civilian shares: The Guardian reported that a classified Israeli military database indicated about an 83% civilian death rate among Palestinians killed by Israeli forces in Gaza through May 2025 [1], and civilian-focused monitors, including AOAV, documented high averages of civilian fatalities per strike compared with past conflicts [6].
2. The Israeli government and military position
The Israeli military asserts it takes extensive measures to minimise civilian harm and characterises many of the dead as militants who do not wear uniforms and operate from within dense civilian populations—claims that underpin public statements that thousands of Hamas fighters have been killed (nearly 20,000 cited in January 2025) and that operations are aimed at eliminating operational threats [2] [7]. Israeli officials and some political figures also dispute external tallies as propaganda or flawed, and the IDF has sometimes relied on its own internal databases as authoritative even where external actors question classifications [1] [2].
3. Human-rights, U.N. and legal assessments
International human-rights organisations, U.N. offices and academics have repeatedly flagged practices that may amount to violations of international humanitarian law, including forcible displacement, restrictions on aid and civilian harm disproportionate to military advantage; the U.N. Human Rights Council and other bodies have placed responsibility on Israel for failures to prevent massive civilian suffering, and Human Rights Watch documented large-scale civilian impact and displacement in Gaza [3] [5]. These findings coexist with reports from Amnesty and others emphasizing atrocities by Palestinian armed groups on October 7, 2023, which complicate causal narratives and legal assessments of responsibility [8].
4. Documented incidents and questions of accountability
Graphic incidents captured on video and reported by major outlets — including footage of Palestinians shot after apparent surrender in the West Bank and reports of summary killings — have triggered internal probes and international criticism; The Guardian and AP documented such episodes that are under review by Israeli authorities even as some Israeli political leaders defended hardline responses [9] [10]. Observers note that prosecutions and accountability for Israeli forces accused of unlawful killings are rare, raising concerns about impunity and investigative independence [9].
5. Why civilian tolls have been so high — operational and structural factors
Analysts point to multiple interacting causes: intense urban warfare in one of the most densely populated territories on earth, use of heavy explosive munitions in built-up areas, restrictions on humanitarian access, and the collapse of medical and civil infrastructure — all of which magnify civilian harm [6] [5]. Combatant identification is also difficult because armed groups often operate without uniforms, which Israel cites to justify strikes, while critics say that distinction cannot excuse operations that foreseeably cause mass civilian casualties [2] [7].
6. Conclusion — contested facts, clear human consequences
The empirical record in the provided reporting is stark: very large numbers of Palestinians have been killed and a high proportion appear to be civilians according to multiple sources, while Israel maintains operational justifications and reports large militant casualties [1] [2]. The debate is not only about counts but about legality, intent and accountability — with U.N. and rights bodies urging independent investigations and many Israeli and international voices warning that tactics producing high civilian death rates risk grave breaches of humanitarian law and long-term strategic blowback [3] [4].