Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: An airstrike targets a facility in Kermanshah

Checked on June 21, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The analyses confirm that Israeli airstrikes did target facilities in Kermanshah, though the specific details vary across sources. The Institute for the Study of War reports that the IDF struck over 35 missile storage and launch infrastructure sites in both Tabriz and Kermanshah [1]. This represents a significant military operation targeting Iran's missile capabilities in the region.

Two distinct types of facilities were reportedly hit:

  • Military infrastructure: Satellite imagery analysis suggests that a missile base near Kermanshah was damaged by Israeli airstrikes, with visible damage confirmed through satellite images [2]
  • Civilian infrastructure: The Tehran Times reports that Farabi Hospital in Kermanshah was bombed by Israel [3]

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original statement lacks crucial context about the scale and nature of the strikes. The analyses reveal this was not an isolated incident but part of a broader military campaign targeting over 35 sites across multiple Iranian cities [1].

Key missing elements include:

  • The strikes targeted both military missile infrastructure and civilian facilities like hospitals
  • This appears to be part of Israel's systematic targeting of Iran's missile capabilities
  • The timing context - these strikes occurred as part of ongoing regional tensions

Different stakeholders benefit from emphasizing different aspects:

  • Israeli military and political leadership benefit from highlighting the precision strikes on missile infrastructure as legitimate military targets
  • Iranian government and media benefit from emphasizing attacks on civilian infrastructure like hospitals to portray Israel as targeting non-combatants
  • International observers and defense analysts benefit from focusing on the strategic implications of targeting Iran's missile capabilities

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement is overly vague and potentially misleading by omitting critical details. While technically accurate that facilities in Kermanshah were targeted, it fails to specify:

  • The dual nature of targets - both military missile sites and civilian hospitals were reportedly struck
  • The scale of the operation - this was part of strikes on over 35 locations, not a single facility [1]
  • The type of facilities - ranging from missile storage and launch infrastructure to medical facilities

The neutral phrasing masks the controversial nature of strikes that allegedly included civilian infrastructure like hospitals [3], which could constitute violations of international humanitarian law. The statement's brevity could serve to minimize public awareness of the full scope and potential civilian impact of the military operation.

Want to dive deeper?
What was the target of the Kermanshah airstrike?
Who was responsible for the airstrike in Kermanshah?
What were the casualties of the Kermanshah airstrike?
How has the Kermanshah airstrike affected regional tensions?
What is the strategic importance of the Kermanshah facility?