Fact check: What was the last major military parade held in the US before Trump's presidency?

1. Summary of the results

Based on the analyses provided, the last major military parade held in the US before Trump's presidency was in 1991 to celebrate the end of the Gulf War ^[1]. This parade was substantial in scale, featuring approximately 8,000 military personnel and drawing around 800,000 attendees ^[1].

The sources confirm that military parades have historical precedent in the United States, with the Grand Review of the Armies in 1865 being cited as another significant example from American history ^{[2] [3]}. However, the 1991 Gulf War victory parade represents the most recent major military parade prior to the Trump administration.

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original question lacks important historical context about the 26-year gap between major military parades in the United States. The analyses reveal that while the concept of military parades is not new in American history ^[2], there was a significant period without such displays between 1991 and Trump's presidency.

The sources also highlight that military parades have deep historical roots in America, dating back to the Civil War era with events like the Grand Review of the Armies in 1865 ^{[2] [3]}. This historical context suggests that military parades, while infrequent in modern times, have been part of American military tradition during significant national moments.

Missing from the analyses is information about why there was such a long gap between major military parades, or what factors typically drive decisions to hold such events in the United States.

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question itself does not contain misinformation or apparent bias - it is a straightforward factual inquiry about historical events. The question appropriately seeks to establish a timeline reference point by asking specifically about events "before Trump's presidency."

However, one source appears to have limited analytical value regarding the core question, as it "does not provide a clear answer to the question" but instead focuses on historical precedents without addressing the specific timeframe requested ^[2]. This could potentially lead to confusion about the actual answer to the question posed.

The analyses collectively provide a clear, factual response supported by specific data about attendance and participation numbers, suggesting the sources used were credible and detailed in their reporting.