Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: Deploying Marines and National Guard to LA protests is costing $134 million
1. Summary of the results
The stated cost of $134 million for deploying Marines and National Guard to LA protests is accurately reported and has been confirmed by multiple sources, specifically by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's acting comptroller Bryn Woollacott MacDonnell during a congressional hearing [1] [2]. The deployment consists of 700 Marines and approximately 2,100-4,100 National Guard members [3] [4]. The funding is specifically allocated for "travel, housing and food" and will come from operations and maintenance accounts [5].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
Several crucial pieces of context are missing from the original statement:
- The deployment is planned for 60 days [5]
- The deployment was ordered by President Trump over the objections of California Governor Gavin Newsom [6]
- The stated purpose is to protect federal buildings and personnel during immigration raid protests [4]
- Importantly, the Marines have not yet been called to actively respond to any protests [5]
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
While the cost figure itself is accurate, the original statement lacks important contextual elements that could affect public perception:
- The statement doesn't clarify that this is a preventative measure, as the Marines haven't been actively engaged in responding to protests [5]
- It doesn't mention the political conflict between federal and state authorities, with Governor Newsom opposing the deployment [6]
- The number of personnel involved varies between sources (2,100 vs 4,100 National Guard troops), which could affect cost justification [3] [4]
Beneficiaries of different narratives:
- Federal government benefits from emphasizing the need for protection of federal buildings and personnel [4]
- State government (particularly Governor Newsom) benefits from portraying this as federal overreach [6]
- Defense contractors and service providers benefit from the significant operational and maintenance spending [5]