Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: What are the duties of National Guard troops at the US-Mexico border?
Executive Summary
National Guard duties at the U.S.–Mexico border center on support roles for federal and state homeland security partners, chiefly providing surveillance, aviation, engineering, logistics, and infrastructure and detention support rather than direct civilian law enforcement, though the exact tasks and legal authorities vary by activation status and mission orders [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. Recent memos and Department of Defense updates show expanding and shifting uses — including requests for large numbers of troops for immigration-related tasks and changes in duty status from Title 10 to Title 32 — creating differences in what guardsmen may legally do and who controls them [3] [6] [5]. These developments reflect a mix of longstanding practice dating to the 2000s and evolving operational emphases in 2024–2025 tied to state-led operations and federal support missions [7] [8] [1].
1. Why Guardsmen are sent: the operational pitch that keeps recurring
National Guard deployments to the southern border are consistently justified as force-multipliers for Border Patrol and Customs and Border Protection, supplying manpower and capabilities to detect and deter illegal crossings, drug smuggling, and other threats; examples from recent briefings put active military and guardsmen totals in the thousands and describe patrols, observation posts, and aviation support as primary tasks [1] [2]. Governors and the Department of Defense cite drug interdiction, migrant surges, and support for overwhelmed federal agencies to explain missions, and state activations under operations like Lone Star explicitly emphasize construction and security patrols as legitimate state-authorized actions [8] [7]. This operational pitch has persisted since early federal border missions such as Operation Jump Start in 2006 and continued deployments through the 2010s into the present, showing continuity in purpose though not uniformity in rules-of-engagement [7] [8].
2. What guardsmen actually do day-to-day: surveillance, logistics, and construction
On the ground, National Guard troops predominantly fill non-law-enforcement roles: staffing observation posts, running aerial surveillance missions, maintaining logistics and maintenance chains, conducting route and security patrols, and assisting with engineering tasks such as building or repairing barriers and infrastructure. Recent official tallies describe thousands of patrols and aviation sorties and emphasize support functions like transportation, detention support, and document translation when specifically authorized, while some mission statements stress that guardsmen do not execute arrests as primary law-enforcement officers [1] [2] [3] [4]. State activations sometimes expand this portfolio; for example, Missouri’s deployment under gubernatorial authority explicitly assigned construction of physical barriers and patrol duties, highlighting how activation status shapes duties [8].
3. Legal lines and who’s in charge: Title 10, Title 32, or state active duty
The legal authority that governs a Guard deployment determines what troops can legally do and who controls them, and this is central to understanding duties: Title 10 federalizes forces under presidential control with Posse Comitatus implications; Title 32 keeps them under state command while allowing federal funding and broader domestic activity; state active duty places guardsmen under a governor’s control and state law, permitting certain activities federal troops could not perform [5] [8]. Recent 2025 changes reported by the Defense Department that moved personnel from Title 10 to Title 32 and expanded authorized numbers to roughly 1,700 reflect an intentional legal shift to broaden allowable support while keeping governors in the chain-of-command, altering the practical mix of tasks and reducing Posse Comitatus constraints [6].
4. Contested functions: detention, interdiction, and “immigration-enforcement” language
A June 2025 DHS memo reportedly requested up to 20,000 National Guard troops for activities described as immigration-enforcement, including night operations, rural interdiction, transportation, detention support, and riot control inside detention facilities, a list that would move Guardsmen closer to functions historically limited by civil-military law and public concern [3]. Pentagon and DHS statements and congressional oversight have varied in tone and scope: while some DoD briefings emphasize supportive, non-law-enforcement roles and joint patrol metrics like claimed “zero gotaways” over certain periods, the DHS memo’s language shows a push for broader involvement and capabilities, creating tension between operational demand and legal safeguards [2] [3].
5. The politically charged landscape and implications for oversight
Deployments are politically salient: governors may activate Guardsmen under state authority for politically framed missions, and federal administrations use DoD support to relieve border agencies, which produces differing agendas and oversight needs; state deployments like Missouri’s were publicly framed around drug interdiction and local impacts, while federal briefings have focused on joint capabilities and interdiction statistics [8] [2]. These differences matter because activation type dictates legal constraints, funding, and accountability, and recent shifts in duty status and DHS memo requests underscore the need for clarity from Congress and watchdogs on how many troops are used, under what authorities, and what training and rules of engagement govern detention and direct-interdiction tasks [6] [5] [3].