Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: NATO members agreed to spend 2% of GDP per year on defence by 2022

Checked on March 4, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The original statement contains an inaccurate timeline. NATO members actually agreed to spend 2% of GDP on defence by 2025, not 2022, with this commitment being made at the 2014 summit following Russia's annexation of Crimea [1] [2]. The progress has been significant but gradual:

  • In 2014, only three Allies met the 2% guideline [3]
  • By 2017, this number increased to four nations [1]
  • As of mid-2023, 11 of 31 NATO countries were on track [4]
  • By 2024, 18 member countries are expected to reach the target [4]
  • For 2024, more optimistic projections suggest 23 Allies will meet or exceed the 2% target [5]

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Several crucial contextual elements are missing from the original statement:

  • The 2% commitment was specifically triggered by Russia's annexation of Crimea in 2014 [2]
  • Countries bordering Russia or Ukraine are more likely to meet the target, highlighting the geopolitical nature of defense spending [6]
  • Some countries significantly exceed the 2% threshold:
  • Poland: 3.90%
  • US: 3.49%
  • Greece: 3.01% [4]
  • European Allies and Canada have collectively increased their defense investment from 1.43% of GDP in 2014 to 2.02% in 2024 [5]
  • NATO increasingly views 2% as a "floor and not a ceiling" in response to a more dangerous world [3]

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The statement oversimplifies a complex situation and contains several misleading elements:

  • It presents the commitment as a firm deadline for 2022, when it was actually 2025 [1]
  • It implies universal compliance, when major powers like Germany (1.57%) and France are still not meeting the target [6]
  • It fails to acknowledge that NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg is pushing for "a new more ambitious defence spending pledge," suggesting the current commitment may not be sufficient [3]

Those benefiting from higher defense spending include:

  • Defense contractors and military industries
  • Countries bordering Russia, who gain increased security
  • NATO's strategic position against potential threats
  • The US defense industry, as the largest NATO contributor
Want to dive deeper?
Jamal Roberts gave away his winnings to an elementary school.
Did a theater ceiling really collapse in the filming of the latest Final Destination?
Is Rachel Zegler suing South Park?