Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: Germany had initially a lot of success on the ground during World War 2 because their soldiers were on amphetamines

Checked on May 30, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The statement about Germany's initial World War 2 success being linked to amphetamine use is partially supported by multiple sources, though it presents an oversimplified view. Methamphetamine (Pervitin) was indeed widely used in the German military, with over 35 million tablets distributed to approximately 3 million German soldiers [1]. The drug, introduced in 1938, was considered a "miracle product" that aligned with Nazi ideology of superhuman performance [2].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Several crucial contextual elements are missing from the original statement:

  • Military Strategy: Some sources emphasize that Germany's success was primarily due to strategic surprise, rapid military tactics, and Hitler's aggressive military planning, rather than drug use alone [3].
  • Specific Drug Details: The drug used was specifically methamphetamine (Pervitin), not general amphetamines [4]. It allowed soldiers to:
  • Fight for up to three consecutive days without sleep [5]
  • Suppress fear and create a sense of invincibility [6]
  • Reduce sensitivity to pain, hunger, and tiredness [4]
  • Official Support: Military doctors, specifically Otto Friedrich Ranke, believed Pervitin could help Germany win the war [4].

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement oversimplifies a complex historical situation by:

  • Attributing success solely to drugs: While Pervitin played a significant role in enabling the Blitzkrieg strategy [2], military historians also emphasize technological advantages and geopolitical circumstances as crucial factors [7].
  • Omitting institutional context: The statement fails to mention that this was a systematic, state-sponsored program, not just individual soldier usage. The Nazi regime actively promoted Pervitin as aligning with their ideology of superiority [2].
  • Beneficiaries of different narratives:
  • Military historians and academics benefit from emphasizing strategic and tactical factors [3] [7]
  • Those studying drug history and pharmaceutical influence on warfare benefit from emphasizing the role of Pervitin
  • The pharmaceutical industry at the time, particularly Temmler-Werke (the manufacturer of Pervitin), benefited financially from promoting the drug's military applications
Want to dive deeper?
Jamal Roberts gave away his winnings to an elementary school.
Did a theater ceiling really collapse in the filming of the latest Final Destination?
Is Rachel Zegler suing South Park?