What were the official causes of death for the two National Guard members in D.C.?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Available reporting shows rapidly changing and sometimes conflicting accounts about the victims’ statuses after the Nov. 26, 2025 ambush near the White House: many outlets initially reported both Guardsmen were critically wounded and hospitalized (e.g., CNN, NPR, AP), while later statements from political figures and some outlets said one victim — Specialist Sarah Beckstrom — had died (The New York Times, The Washington Post). The core, contemporaneous official line in early coverage was that both West Virginia National Guard members were shot and remained in critical condition [1] [2] [3]; subsequent announcements about a death are reported by other outlets and public figures [4] [5].
1. Early official account: “both in critical condition” — law enforcement and federal prosecutors
Initial law-enforcement briefings and major news organizations described the incident as an ambush that left two West Virginia National Guard members hospitalized and critically wounded. CNN, reporting on live updates, stated that both Guardsmen were in critical condition and identified the suspect; NPR also reported both remained hospitalized in critical condition and that federal prosecutors called the shooting a “targeted attack” [1] [2]. The Associated Press likewise described emergency responders on scene and referenced wounded guardsmen without confirming deaths [3].
2. Later public statements and apparent shift: one death reported by political leaders and state officials
Within the hours after initial reporting, prominent officials and some outlets announced that Specialist Sarah Beckstrom had died. The New York Times live updates note President Trump and West Virginia’s governor saying Beckstrom had passed, and The Washington Post’s live coverage reports that one of the victims — Sarah Beckstrom — had been named and later confirmed deceased in social-media posts by state officials [4] [5]. These statements represent an apparent update to earlier hospital-status reports, but they originate largely from political leaders and state announcements rather than being framed as a forensic or medical release in every account [4] [5].
3. Conflicting reports and immediate confusion: governor backtracks and reporting discrepancies
Reporting in the immediate aftermath shows confusion. Some initial social-media posts and statements (for example from West Virginia’s governor) were later clarified or retracted in various outlets, producing contradictory headlines about whether either or both Guardsmen had died [6] [7]. Media summaries and aggregations noted these discrepancies: newsrooms were updating live as officials — local, state, and federal — provided new or competing information [8] [6].
4. What the cited sources explicitly state — and what they do not
Contemporaneous major news dispatches (CNN, NPR, AP) clearly state both Guardsmen were critically wounded and hospitalized after the shooting [1] [2] [3]. Other sources (New York Times, Washington Post, and some political statements) report that Specialist Sarah Beckstrom had died and that the remaining soldier was in critical condition or fighting for life [4] [5]. Available sources do not mention a definitive, contemporaneous medical examiner’s cause-of-death report or a formal hospital death certificate being cited in reporting; the immediate death assertions come via public officials and press updates [4] [5] [8].
5. Why this matters: differing sources, possible agendas, and the pace of breaking news
Breaking coverage combined statements from law enforcement, federal prosecutors, state officials, and national political leaders; each actor has different incentives and access. Federal prosecutors framed the incident as a targeted attack and announced charges, which highlights criminal-justice priorities [2]. Political leaders — including the President — used the incident to comment on immigration and deployment policies, which introduces partisan and policy-driven framing into early public statements [4] [1]. Those differing priorities help explain why health-status updates and death reports emerged unevenly and sometimes contradicted earlier accounts [8] [6].
6. Bottom line for your original question
If your question asks strictly for the “official causes of death” for the two National Guard members, available sources do not mention formal, forensic causes of death (e.g., gunshot wound specifics or medical examiner findings) cited in press reports; early reporting focuses on their being shot and hospitalized, with later public statements indicating at least one death announced by officials [1] [2] [4] [5]. For a definitive, medical cause-of-death statement, current reporting does not cite a medical examiner’s report or hospital confirmation in the sources provided [4] [5] [3].