Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: Pentagon says deploying Marines and National Guard to LA protests is costing $134 million

Checked on June 10, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The Pentagon's stated cost of $134 million for the deployment is consistently confirmed across multiple sources [1]. This figure was officially provided by Acting Comptroller Bryn Woollacott MacDonnell during a congressional hearing under Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. The deployment is planned to last 60 days [2] and primarily covers basic operational costs such as travel, housing, and food [2].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original statement omits several crucial details:

  • Force composition: The deployment consists of approximately 700 Marines and between 2,000-4,100 National Guard troops (varying by source) [1] [2]
  • Limited authority: The troops have no arrest authority and are specifically deployed to protect federal property and personnel [2]
  • Current status: As of the reporting, the troops had not yet been called to respond to any protests [2]
  • Political controversy: The deployment has faced significant opposition, with Governor Gavin Newsom condemning the response and California filing a federal lawsuit challenging its legality [3]

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement's framing could be misleading in several ways:

  • It doesn't mention that the cost covers a 60-day period, which could make the figure seem more dramatic than it is [2]
  • It fails to specify that the deployment is preventative in nature, focusing on property protection rather than active engagement with protesters [2]
  • The statement doesn't acknowledge the legal challenges and state-level opposition to the deployment [3]

Different stakeholders benefit from different interpretations:

  • Federal government benefits from emphasizing the necessity of protection for federal property
  • State government (particularly California) benefits from portraying this as federal overreach
  • Immigration rights activists benefit from highlighting this as an excessive and militarized response to protests
  • Budget hawks benefit from focusing on the cost to taxpayers
Want to dive deeper?
What was the total federal response cost to civil unrest in Los Angeles?
How does the $134 million deployment cost compare to other military domestic operations?
What specific LA protests prompted the Pentagon to deploy Marines and National Guard?
How are costs calculated when federal troops are deployed for domestic civil unrest?
What oversight exists for Pentagon spending on domestic military deployments?