Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: Can the president deploy national guard under title 10 to protect federal property.

Checked on June 9, 2025

1. Summary of the results

Yes, the president can deploy National Guard under Title 10 to protect federal property, but with specific limitations. This has been demonstrated through historical precedent, most notably when President Trump deployed 2,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles [1] [2]. However, it's crucial to understand that Title 10 deployment comes with significant restrictions - specifically, the Posse Comitatus Act prohibits the Guard from conducting law enforcement actions inside the U.S. under Title 10 [3].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Several important contextual elements are missing from the original question:

  • There are two distinct mechanisms for federal deployment:
  • Title 10 authority (for protective and supportive functions)
  • The Insurrection Act (which provides broader law enforcement powers) [4]
  • Such deployments can occur without governor approval, though this is rare - the 2020 Los Angeles deployment was the first such instance since 1965 [5]
  • The primary purpose of Title 10 deployment is specifically to protect federal personnel and property [2], not to conduct raids or regular policing activities [5]

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question oversimplifies a complex legal framework by:

  • Not acknowledging the distinction between Title 10 and Insurrection Act powers [6]
  • Failing to mention the significant limitations on what federalized National Guard troops can actually do under Title 10 [3]
  • Not addressing the rare and exceptional nature of such deployments without governor approval [5]

This oversimplification could benefit various stakeholders:

  • Federal authorities seeking to expand executive power might emphasize the president's ability to deploy troops while downplaying restrictions
  • State authorities might emphasize the rarity and limitations of such deployments to maintain state control over National Guard units
Want to dive deeper?
What is the difference between Title 10 and Title 32 National Guard deployment?
Can state governors refuse federal deployment of their National Guard units?
What federal properties can the National Guard be deployed to protect?
Has the president ever used Title 10 to deploy National Guard for property protection?
What are the legal limits on presidential National Guard deployment authority?