Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

Have Russian forces or law enforcement used silent revolvers in documented operations?

Checked on November 21, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important info or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Documented Russian designs of “silent” revolvers exist from World War II through the late Soviet and Russian eras—examples include the Gurevich experimental revolver [1], the Nagant M1895’s gas-seal system (late 19th century design later used with suppressors), and the modern OTs-38 Stechkin, built to fire intrinsically quiet SP‑4 cartridges and reportedly developed for Russian security services [2] [3] [4]. Available sources discuss development, testing, and service intent but do not provide independent, detailed operational after-action accounts proving specific uses in named law‑enforcement or military operations; reporting emphasizes design, testing, and service use claims [2] [4] [5].

1. Historical roots: Nagant and Gurevich show early Soviet interest

Russia’s path to silent revolvers began well before the Cold War: the Nagant M1895 featured a unique gas-seal system that allowed it to be suppressed, making it “the first revolver that could be equipped with a ‘silencer’ type device,” and historians trace its distinctive cartridge and cylinder-forward design to that role [3]. During World War II, engineer Yevgeny Gurevich developed a captive‑piston/specially treated‑ammo concept and produced a 7.62 mm five‑shot experimental silent revolver; the GAU ordered limited production for testing but the design was not widely adopted, partly because of problems (including limited effective range and practical drawbacks) noted in later writeups [2] [6].

2. The Soviet captive‑piston lineage and its logic for special missions

Soviet designers repeatedly pursued captive‑piston ammunition and revolver concepts because sealing propellant gases in the cartridge avoids the cylinder gap that ruins suppression on conventional wheelguns. Technical analyses and small‑arms journalism explain that SP‑series silent cartridges and captive‑piston designs produce very low report and are intended for “special-purpose” use by elite teams [5] [2]. Secret‑weapons forum discussions and historical pieces note the tradeoffs—limited range, logistics of special ammo, and sensory signatures (e.g., smell) that reduced some designs’ appeal for mass adoption [6].

3. The OTs‑38 Stechkin: a late‑Soviet / Russian, service‑oriented silent revolver

The OTs‑38 Stechkin is the best‑documented modern Russian silent revolver: it fires the SP‑4 cartridge, uses bottom‑chamber firing and unusual cylinder mechanics, and was developed as an alternative to the PSS silent pistol; articles state it was built on request from the FSB and by a Tula design bureau (TSKIB SOO), and testers report it to be effectively silent in firing tests [7] [4] [8]. Technical accounts emphasize its operational intent—compact, quiet handgun for special services—rather than providing front‑line operational narratives [4] [5].

4. What counts as “documented operations”: design vs documented use

Available sources clearly document Russian development, testing, and stated service introduction of silent revolvers (Gurevich testing orders, Nagant suppressability, OTs‑38 built for FSB) but do not include verifiable, named operational after‑action reports showing these weapons in specific law‑enforcement raids or battlefield engagements in mainstream reporting excerpts provided here [2] [3] [4]. That gap matters: procurement or design-for-service does not prove specific operational employment in a particular raid or conflict.

5. Conflicting signals and limitations in reporting

Some sources assert active use by elite teams for SP‑4–based pistols (the PSS is “currently used by many elite Russian anti‑terrorist teams”) and link the OTs‑38 to FSB requests, which implies operational deployment potential; others highlight test limitations (range, scent, logistics) and note that some experimental designs were never widely adopted [5] [6] [4]. This produces two plausible interpretations: (A) silent revolvers are part of Russia’s special‑purpose small‑arms toolkit and have seen at least limited service use, and (B) many designs remained niche or experimental and are not widely documented in post‑operation reporting [5] [2].

6. Bottom line for the question asked

Yes—Russian forces and security organs developed and, in some cases, fielded silent revolvers: historic experiments (Gurevich), suppressible classics (Nagant M1895), and a modern OTs‑38 designed for and reportedly produced for FSB use are all documented in technical and historical sources [2] [3] [4]. However, available reporting included here does not supply public, independently verified case‑by‑case operational narratives showing named law‑enforcement or military operations in which those specific revolvers were used; that level of operational documentation is not found in the current set of sources (not found in current reporting; [4]; p1_s3).

Want to dive deeper?
What models of silent or integrally suppressed revolvers have been developed in Russia or the Soviet Union?
Are there confirmed cases of Russian military special forces using silent revolvers in combat or covert raids?
Have Russian law enforcement agencies (FSB, FSO, OMON) used silent revolvers in documented domestic operations or arrests?
How do silent revolvers compare to suppressor-equipped semi-automatic pistols in Russian special operations doctrine?
What open-source evidence (photos, video, official reports) exists showing use of silent revolvers by Russian units since 2000?