Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What are the unit procurement cost ranges for the Saab Gripen variants (C/D, E/F) including weapons and support packages?
Executive summary
Published contract evidence from 2025 shows recent Gripen E/F deals range from about €3.1 billion for 17 jets (≈$3.6bn total) to previous large-package references such as Brazil’s ~$4.7bn for 36 F‑39E [1] [2]. Public reporting and analyst estimates therefore produce wide implied unit procurement ranges—roughly $85–$213 million per E/F when weapons, training and long‑term support are folded in, while some older or academic studies still cite much lower unit‑only figures (as low as ~$69–$85m) for airframe‑only or domestic accounting [1] [3] [4] [5].
1. Why one single “price” doesn’t exist: packages, offsets and financing
Gripen sales are negotiated as full packages—airframes plus weapons, training, industrial offsets and long‑term support—so headline totals can’t be translated to a single unit “flyaway” cost without unpacking those extras [1] [6]. For example, Saab’s confirmed €3.1bn Colombia sale explicitly covers 15 E + 2 F plus “associated equipment and weapons, training and services” and offset agreements, which drives the per‑aircraft implied price up compared with a narrow airframe‑only figure [1] [6].
2. Recent real deals: observed E/F package prices and implied unit costs
Three recent benchmarks appear repeatedly in reporting: Colombia’s €3.1bn (~$3.6bn) for 17 E/F (implying ≈$212–$213M/aircraft if divided equally) [6] [1]; Thailand’s 2025 order for 4 E/F at THB19.5bn (~$595M, implying ≈$148.75M per aircraft if split) [7]; and Brazil’s 2014‑era contract cited as ~$4.7bn for 36 jets and heavy technology transfer (≈$130M per aircraft but including major local production investments) [2]. Breaking Defence and Reuters cite the Colombia headline and note it covers aircraft plus equipment and offsets [6] [8].
3. Analyst and media estimates: a wide band depending on scope
Independent analyses and media outlets give divergent per‑unit numbers because they use different scopes: airframe only, airframe+weapons, or full lifecycle packages. Airframe‑focused outlets cited the Gripen E at about $85M apiece in some reporting [9] [3], while a data analysis piece treating Colombia’s deal as full package cost gives ≈$213M per jet including weapons, training and support [5]. An academic‑style estimate that seeks a “unit procurement cost” for Gripen produced a much lower figure (~$68.9M), but that work explicitly treats domestic accounting and excludes many export package elements [4].
4. Weapons and support add substantial, variable cost
Multiple sources stress that weapons, pods, training and sustainment can materially change unit economics. Press and Saab’s own statements show the Colombia deal included "associated equipment and weapons, training and services" plus offsets—explaining why per‑aircraft implied costs exceed simple airframe price estimates [1] [6]. Defence Express, NDA Study and Breaking Defense all highlight that excluding or including such items changes the per‑unit number dramatically [10] [5] [8].
5. Legacy C/D vs modern E/F: different baselines
The older Gripen C/D was historically marketed as a lower‑cost fighter and academic estimates sometimes reflect that. Contemporary sources note the E/F is “entirely new” in many respects and therefore commands a higher per‑unit procurement cost than C/D figures commonly cited—production, sensors and engines on E/F push its package price upward relative to C/D-era numbers [11] [2].
6. How to translate published totals into a practical range
Using available contracts and reporting, a defensible practical range for recent procurement (E/F) is: airframe‑only reported/estimated figures ≈$68–$85M; airframe+weapons/training/support (typical export packages) ≈$130–$213M per aircraft depending on the buyer’s offsets, industrial workshare and support scope [4] [3] [2] [5] [1]. The top end aligns with straightforward division of the Colombia headline sum by aircraft; the lower end aligns with press/industry airframe estimates and historical Brazil pricing adjusted in some analyses [1] [3] [2].
7. Competing interpretations and reporting disagreements
Sources disagree on what to include. Reuters, FlightGlobal and Breaking Defense report the raw Colombia contract total and note weapon/support inclusions [6] [1] [8]. Defence Express and Defence‑UA derive higher per‑unit figures from ministry documents or by including comprehensive packages [10] [12] [13]. Academic/industry studies that produce lower per‑unit costs typically restrict scope to procurement or domestic accounting, and explicitly warn export contracts are “slewed by commercial considerations” [4].
8. Practical takeaway for buyers and analysts
When comparing Gripen C/D vs E/F prices, insist on apples‑to‑apples scope: is the quote airframe flyaway, including weapons and sensors, or a multi‑year support and offset package? Available contract examples show E/F export packages commonly fall in a broadly accepted band of roughly $130–$213M per jet when fully specified; narrower airframe‑only estimates sit significantly lower (≈$68–$85M) [1] [3] [4] [5].
Limitations: publicly available coverage in these sources does not list detailed line items (unit flyaway vs weapons vs sustainment) for every contract, so exact decompositions are not possible from the provided reporting (available sources do not mention granular line‑by‑line cost breakdowns).