Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: The T-14 armata program has failed to deliver on almost every level.

Checked on April 12, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The statement about the T-14 Armata's failure is largely supported by multiple sources, but requires important context. The program initially planned to produce 2,300 tanks between 2015-2020 [1] [1], but has faced significant challenges across multiple areas:

  • Production Issues: By 2018, Russia effectively cancelled the main production run [1], with continual delays and shifting timelines for serial production between 2021-2022 [1]
  • Cost Problems: The tank costs over 7.1 million euros per unit, triple the cost of a T-90 [2]
  • Technical Challenges: Significant issues were reported with the A-85-3 engine [3]

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original statement lacks several crucial pieces of context:

  • Production Scale Adjustment: Rather than complete failure, Russia adapted its ambitions, reducing orders from 2,300 to approximately 100 tanks [2]
  • Current Status: As of March 2024, Rostec CEO announced the tank had entered service, though not as a T-90 replacement due to cost concerns [1]
  • Testing History: The tank underwent field testing in Syria [4]
  • Strategic Shift: The program might be viewed as a successful propaganda tool rather than a failed military project [5]

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The statement's absolutist tone ("failed to deliver on almost every level") overlooks important nuances:

  • Military-Industrial Complex Interests: Russian defense contractors and state media benefit from portraying the program as ongoing and successful, while Western analysts benefit from emphasizing its failures
  • Technological Achievement: While production failed, the tank represents significant technological advancement, serving as a "political symbol" [6]
  • Sanctions Impact: International sanctions have significantly impacted production capabilities [6], suggesting external factors rather than purely internal failure
  • Practical Considerations: Russia's continued reliance on upgraded Soviet-era tanks may be more about practicality than program failure [6]

The reality appears to be that while the program has indeed faced significant challenges and failed to meet its initial production goals, characterizing it as a complete failure overlooks its role as a technological demonstrator and propaganda tool for Russian military capabilities.

Want to dive deeper?
Jamal Roberts gave away his winnings to an elementary school.
Did a theater ceiling really collapse in the filming of the latest Final Destination?
Is Rachel Zegler suing South Park?