Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: Turkey shot down Russian warplane and nothing happened
1. Summary of the results
The statement that "nothing happened" after Turkey shot down a Russian warplane is demonstrably false. The incident occurred on November 24, 2015, when a Turkish F-16 shot down a Russian Su-24 aircraft near the Syria-Turkey border [1]. This was a historically significant event, being the first destruction of a Russian/Soviet warplane by a NATO member state since 1953 [2].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
The incident involved conflicting narratives:
- Turkey claimed the Russian aircraft violated its airspace for 17 seconds and was warned 10 times [2]
- Russia maintained the jet never left Syrian territory and denied receiving any warnings [1]
The aftermath included significant consequences:
- Diplomatic: Russia cancelled military contacts, suspended visa-free travel, and Foreign Minister Lavrov cancelled his Turkey visit [2]
- Economic: Russia imposed broad sanctions, including:
Ban on charter flights to Turkey
Restrictions on Turkish imports
- Prevention of Russian tourism to Turkey [2]
- Military: Russia deployed advanced S-300F and S-400 missile systems and increased military operations in Syria [2]
Important contextual background: The incident occurred amid existing tensions between Russia and Turkey over Syria, particularly regarding Russia's bombing of ethnic Turkmen rebels [3].
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The statement "nothing happened" represents a severe oversimplification that:
- Ignores the complex geopolitical context of Russian-Turkish relations
- Overlooks the significant economic impact on both countries
- Disregards the military escalation that followed
Beneficiaries of this narrative:
- Those seeking to downplay NATO-Russia tensions might benefit from minimizing the incident's significance
- Groups opposing military intervention in Syria could use this narrative to suggest limited consequences for military confrontations
- The Turkish government might benefit from downplaying the economic consequences of their military action
The reality shows that the incident had far-reaching consequences, including Putin's accusation of Turkey supporting terrorists and Russia's introduction of a bill criminalizing Armenian genocide denial [2], demonstrating how a single military incident can trigger multiple diplomatic, economic, and military responses.