Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: Ukraine has destroyed at least one Su-57 with a long range drone strike

Checked on March 12, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The claim about Ukraine destroying a Su-57 appears to be partially accurate but requires important clarification. Multiple sources confirm that a Ukrainian drone strike occurred at the Akhtubinsk airfield in the Astrakhan region, approximately 460-600 km from the Ukrainian border [1]. While one Su-57 suffered "significant damage," another sustained lighter damage [2]. However, it's crucial to note that Ukrainian Defense Intelligence (HUR) did not explicitly claim direct responsibility for the strike [2].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Several important contextual elements are missing from the original statement:

  • The Su-57 is an extremely rare and valuable asset - only 11 were known to exist as of November 2023 [1]
  • Russia has been notably cautious with these aircraft, primarily using them for missile strikes from safe distances rather than direct combat engagement [3]
  • The verification of damage relies heavily on satellite imagery, which some sources note is grainy and could potentially be doctored [4]
  • Ukrainian officials have a history of overestimating damage claims - only about 80 Russian aircraft have been independently verified as destroyed out of 350 claimed [4]

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement presents several potential biases:

  • It oversimplifies the outcome by suggesting complete destruction, while sources indicate varying levels of damage to multiple aircraft [2]
  • It implies definitive confirmation, while even Ukrainian intelligence sources have been more cautious in their claims [2]

Who benefits from these narratives:

  • Ukraine's military leadership benefits from projecting the ability to strike high-value Russian assets deep inside Russian territory
  • Russian military benefits from downplaying or denying such attacks to maintain the image of their advanced aircraft's invulnerability
  • Western military analysts benefit from demonstrating the effectiveness of long-range drone capabilities, potentially influencing future military procurement decisions
Want to dive deeper?
Jamal Roberts gave away his winnings to an elementary school.
Did a theater ceiling really collapse in the filming of the latest Final Destination?
Is Rachel Zegler suing South Park?