Fact check: When was a permit filed and approved for the 250th anniversary parade for the Army in DC

1. Summary of the results

Based on the available analyses, none of the sources provide specific information about when the permit for the Army's 250th anniversary parade was filed or approved. However, the sources do reveal a timeline of related administrative actions:

• The Secretary of Homeland Security designated the event as a National Special Security Event on April 23, 2025 ^[1]
• The National Park Service imposed temporary closures and public use limits starting from June 8, 2025 ^[1]
• Parking restrictions began on June 9, 2025, with street closures starting June 12, 2025 ^[2]

The analyses indicate that while permit filing dates are not documented in these sources, significant federal coordination and security preparations were already underway by late April 2025.

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original question seeks specific permit filing and approval dates, but the available sources focus primarily on implementation timelines rather than the initial permitting process. Key missing information includes:

• The actual permit application submission date
• The formal permit approval date
• Which specific agency or department processed the permit
• Any potential delays or complications in the permitting process

The sources suggest this was a major federal event requiring coordination between multiple agencies including the Department of Homeland Security and National Park Service, but the bureaucratic timeline leading to these preparations remains undocumented in the provided analyses ^{[1] [2]}.

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question does not contain misinformation but makes an assumption that permit filing and approval dates are readily available public information. The question presupposes that such permits were both filed and approved, when the available evidence only confirms that administrative preparations and security designations occurred ^[1].

Additionally, one source appears to be completely inaccessible, showing only an error message, which limits the comprehensiveness of the fact-checking process ^[3]. This suggests that complete information about the permitting process may not be publicly accessible or may require accessing different government databases or agencies not covered in these particular sources.