Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: Did soldiers march poorly out of protest at the recent US army grand military parade?

Checked on June 26, 2025

1. Summary of the results

Based on the analyses provided, there are conflicting accounts regarding whether soldiers marched poorly during the recent US Army grand military parade.

The mainstream news sources (AP News, NPR, and NBC News) make no mention whatsoever of soldiers marching poorly or protesting through their performance [1] [2] [3]. These sources describe the parade as featuring "thousands of uniformed troops" and "thousands of soldiers and over 128 Army tanks" in what appears to be an organized display of military might.

However, alternative sources present a dramatically different narrative. One analysis suggests that poor marching occurred but was not intentional protest - instead, soldiers were "tired, annoyed, and not caring about the parade, which they felt was unnecessary and done to boost Trump's ego" [4]. Another source goes further, claiming soldiers exhibited "spiritless disinterest and frustration with the parade" and that they "were mistreated and didn't care about the parade's outcome" [5].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original question lacks crucial context about who benefits from each narrative:

  • Military leadership and the Trump administration would benefit from the mainstream media portrayal showing a successful, disciplined parade that demonstrates American military strength and unity.
  • Political opponents and critics of military parades would benefit from narratives suggesting soldier dissatisfaction, as this supports arguments that such displays are wasteful ego projects rather than legitimate military exercises.
  • International observers, particularly from China, viewed the parade through a different lens entirely, seeing it as "a symbol of American decline and lack of discipline" [6], which benefits nations seeking to portray American military power as diminished.

The analyses reveal that the parade occurred on Trump's birthday and was met with widespread "No Kings" protests across the nation [1] [2], providing important political context missing from the original question.

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question contains a loaded assumption by asking "Did soldiers march poorly out of protest" rather than simply asking about the soldiers' performance during the parade. This framing presupposes both that poor marching occurred AND that it was intentional protest.

The stark contradiction between mainstream news sources that report no issues and alternative sources claiming widespread soldier dissatisfaction suggests potential bias in reporting. The mainstream sources [1] [2] [3] may be downplaying negative aspects to avoid undermining military morale or providing ammunition to political opponents.

Conversely, the alternative sources [4] [5] may be amplifying unverified claims about soldier attitudes to support anti-Trump narratives. The fact that one source specifically mentions "34felony Trump's birthday Parade Disaster" [5] reveals clear political bias in the framing of events.

Without video evidence or official military statements about soldier performance, the question remains unresolved based on the conflicting analyses provided.

Want to dive deeper?
What are the protocols for soldier conduct during US army parades?
Have there been previous instances of soldiers protesting during US army events?
How does the US army address and discipline soldiers for unprofessional conduct during parades?
What was the official response from the US army regarding the recent parade incident?
Are there any known grievances among US army soldiers that could have led to a protest during the parade?