Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: Which countries have received the most US foreign military financing in 2024?
Executive Summary
US foreign military financing in 2024 was concentrated on a few large, high-profile recipients: Ukraine and Israel received the largest single-country allocations through a congressional $95 billion package, while Australia received substantial AUKUS-related funding and other countries such as Türkiye, Romania, and Israel appear prominently in the State Department’s FY2024 arms transfers totals. Different government reports use distinct categories—congressional supplemental aid, Department of State arms transfers, and Department of Defense security cooperation—so totals depend on the definition used [1] [2] [3].
1. What advocates and lawmakers announced when the $95 billion package passed — Who looked like the biggest winner
Congress passed a $95 billion foreign aid package in 2024 that allocated about $60.8–61 billion for Ukraine, roughly $26–26.4 billion for Israel, and about $8 billion for Indo-Pacific security efforts—figures widely cited in contemporaneous reporting and legislative summaries [1] [4]. These line-item amounts make Ukraine and Israel the top bilateral recipients of that congressional aid stream in 2024. The reporting frames the package as emergency wartime support and strategic replenishment, which explains the large, concentrated allocations rather than a wide dispersal to many countries [1] [4].
2. What the State Department counted across all arms transfers — A broader, higher-dollar picture
The Department of State’s FY2024 arms transfers report lists $117.9 billion in transferred defense articles and services during the fiscal year, a broader accounting that names Türkiye, Israel, and Romania among significant recipients while also noting Australia received about $2.0 billion tied to AUKUS-related training and devices [2]. This figure differs from congressional supplemental aid because it aggregates commercial and government-to-government defense transfers, Foreign Military Sales, and other defense trade, so the list of top recipients shifts depending on whether one counts emergency appropriations or overall transfers documented by State [2].
3. AUKUS money and industrial commitments — Why Australia appears prominently
Congressional and executive reporting highlighted a separate AUKUS-related industrial and capability commitment that included a $5 billion boost to the U.S. submarine-building industry tied to the trilateral Australia agreement, and a distinct $2.0 billion line in the State Department transfers for AUKUS training and devices [3] [2]. Those allocations make Australia a major recipient of targeted, strategic military financing in 2024, but they are purpose-specific and connected to alliance industrial policy rather than broad bilateral security assistance programs, which affects how Australia ranks depending on the accounting method used [3] [2].
4. Defense Department’s security cooperation budget — Smaller programmatic funding across partners
The Department of Defense’s FY2025 security cooperation justification documents a $4.6 billion allocation for security cooperation programs and activities, a pool distinct from the $95 billion emergency package and the State Department’s arms transfer totals [5]. This money supports training, capacity-building, and persistent partnership programs across many countries rather than single large transfers to one beneficiary. Because the DoD number is programmatic and dispersed, it does not by itself identify a single top bilateral recipient for 2024; its presence does underscore multiple channels through which the U.S. financed partner militaries that year [5].
5. Contrasting methodologies produce different “top recipients” — Aid vs. sales vs. emergency supplements
The apparent disagreement between sources reflects different definitions and reporting windows: the congressional $95 billion package is an emergency supplemental focused on Ukraine and Israel, the State Department’s $117.9 billion tallies broader arms transfers over a fiscal year, and the DoD’s $4.6 billion covers ongoing security cooperation programs [1] [2] [5]. As a result, Ukraine and Israel dominate when looking at emergency congressional appropriations, while countries like Türkiye, Romania, and Israel appear large in State Department transfer totals, and Australia stands out in AUKUS-related industrial and training funding [1] [2] [3].
6. Where reporting overlaps and where it leaves gaps — What to watch when comparing numbers
The sources collectively document major flows but omit an apples-to-apples ranked list that combines all channels into a single figure for each country in calendar 2024; the congressional package, State Department transfers, and DoD program budgets are reported on different schedules and use varying categories [4] [2] [5]. Analysts must therefore decide whether they seek emergency wartime appropriations, annual arms transfer valuations, or programmatic security cooperation totals—each yields a different ordering of top recipients, and no single provided source consolidates them into a definitive ranking [2] [1].
7. Bottom line — Answer to the original question across reasonable definitions
If the question focuses on the 2024 congressional emergency package, Ukraine (≈$61B) and Israel (≈$26B) were the largest recipients; if it uses the State Department’s FY2024 arms transfer accounting, Israel, Türkiye, Romania, and Australia (the latter for AUKUS training and devices) are prominent within a $117.9 billion total of transferred defense articles and services [1] [2] [3]. The DoD’s $4.6 billion security cooperation budget is an additional, separate funding stream that spreads support across many partners and does not change the top two when the congressional package is the metric [5].