Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: Https://mil.in.ua/en/news/the-record-us-halts-cyber-operations-against-russia/

Checked on March 1, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The original article's claim about the US halting cyber operations against Russia appears to be significantly misleading. While one source suggests a policy shift under Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth affecting about 25% of offensive Cyber Forces units [1], multiple other sources directly contradict this narrative. General Paul Nakasone has confirmed that the US is actively conducting "offensive, defensive, and information operations" in support of Ukraine [2]. Furthermore, comprehensive US government cybersecurity advisories demonstrate continued active monitoring of Russian cyber threats, including detailed assessments of GRU Unit 29155's operations [3].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Several crucial contextual elements are missing from the original statement:

  • The US maintains extensive technical intelligence on Russian cyber operations targeting NATO and EU countries [3]
  • Russian actors appear to show hesitation in launching cyber attacks due to fear of US retaliation [2]
  • The broader context of US-Ukraine aid is significant, with verified US commitments of approximately $183 billion [4], of which $67 billion is specifically military assistance
  • European allies have actually committed more total aid (approximately $259 billion) compared to US contributions [5]

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The article appears to be part of a larger narrative that may benefit certain political interests:

  • The story aligns with claims suggesting reduced US support for Ukraine, similar to inflated aid figures being circulated (such as Trump's false claim of $350 billion in aid) [6]
  • There's a clear discrepancy between public statements and actual policy: while some sources suggest decreased attention to Russian threats [7], operational evidence shows continued active engagement [2] [3]
  • The timing and nature of the story could benefit actors seeking to:

Create perception of reduced US support for Ukraine

Downplay the actual extent of US cyber capabilities

  • Influence public opinion regarding US-Russia relations

The story appears to selectively interpret certain policy changes while ignoring substantial evidence of continued US cyber engagement with Russia.

Want to dive deeper?
Jamal Roberts gave away his winnings to an elementary school.
Did a theater ceiling really collapse in the filming of the latest Final Destination?
Is Rachel Zegler suing South Park?