Which branches of the US military are seeing the biggest recruitment gains or losses?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Recruiting turned from a multi-year shortfall into a broad upswing in FY2025: the Army reports signing more than 61,000 active‑duty contracts and says it met its FY25 goal four months early [1]. Multiple independent analysts and trackers show most services — Army, Navy, Marine Corps and Air Force — were meeting or exceeding recruiting goals in early FY2025, with Space Force slightly behind at about 97% of goal as of April/June 2025 [2] [3].
1. The big picture: a services‑wide rebound
After several years of trouble, the military saw substantial recruitment gains across most branches in FY2025; RAND, USAFacts and other outlets report that the Army, Navy, Marine Corps and Air Force were meeting or exceeding goals while Space Force lagged slightly (Army 116%, Marine Corps 104%, Navy 101%, Air Force 101%, Space Force 97% as of April/June 2025) [2] [3]. RAND emphasizes this marks a notable shift from FY2023, when only the Marines and Space Force met their goals [2].
2. The Army: the largest documented gain
The clearest single success is the U.S. Army, which announced it had signed contracts with more than 61,000 future soldiers and met its FY25 active‑duty recruiting goal four months early — a target set about 10% higher than FY24 [1]. Independent reporting and think‑tank accounts cite unusually strong daily enlistment rates (e.g., “best December in 15 years” and hundreds of daily contracts) as evidence of the Army’s momentum [4] [5].
3. Navy, Marines and Air Force: meeting or barely exceeding goals
RAND and USAFacts show the Navy, Marine Corps and Air Force reached or slightly exceeded their FY25 mission levels through the months reported, signaling broad recovery beyond the Army alone [2] [3]. RAND and other analysts however flag that numerical attainment does not automatically mean recruit “quality” benchmarks are uniformly met — the Air Force, Space Force and Marines have had better consistency on quality measures, while the Army and Navy may still trail on that score in early FY25 reporting [2] [6].
4. Space Force: steady but short of target
Space Force was the one service not meeting its FY25 numeric target as of the spring/early summer checks cited: roughly 97% of goal by April/June 2025 [3]. RAND notes Space Force had been one of only two services meeting goals in FY2023, but FY25 numbers show it wasn’t leading the rebound [2].
5. Why the upswing? Multiple explanations, contested credit
Experts and public sources attribute the recovery to a mix of causes: pay increases for junior enlistees and across the force, revamped recruiting practices and advertising, added recruiters and use of data analytics, and policy changes such as recruitment prep courses and adjusted medical/waiver policies [3] [7] [6]. Political actors have sought credit — Defense leaders and partisans frame gains differently — and fact‑checking outlets note recruiting began improving before the 2024 election, suggesting multiple factors rather than a single cause [8] [9].
6. Quality and retention caveats: numbers aren’t the whole story
Analysts warn that meeting numeric targets is only part of force readiness. RAND and other commentators stress ongoing concerns about recruit aptitude and quality benchmarks for some branches, and separate reporting highlights retention and specialist‑talent losses even as enlistments rise [6] [10]. Sources note the services’ quality measures differ and that some branches that met numeric goals may still fall short on aptitude indices [2] [6].
7. Political and institutional agendas shaping narratives
Officials emphasize success and reforms (service press releases and Pentagon spokespeople), while critics point to loosened standards or politicized messaging; Defense leaders rebut claims of lowered standards, saying prep courses and recruiter selection improved results rather than reduced standards [7]. Fact‑checkers and independent analysts push back on partisan attributions and urge recognition of preexisting reforms and pay changes [8] [9].
8. What remains unseen in the available reporting
Available sources do not mention detailed branch‑by‑branch final FY25 recruit quality scores for every month through September 2025, nor consolidated post‑FY25 retention metrics tied to the 2025 recruiting cohort — those outcomes remain to be fully reported and analyzed (not found in current reporting). Long‑term readiness effects depend on those metrics as much as on today’s enlistment totals.
Conclusion — measured success, persistent questions
The clear answer from available reporting is that FY2025 saw a broad recruitment rebound led by the Army’s large overperformance, with the Navy, Marines and Air Force generally meeting goals and Space Force just below them [1] [2] [3]. Analysts caution that recruit quality and retention remain essential follow‑up questions and that multiple, overlapping policy changes — not a single cause — almost certainly produced the turnaround [6] [8].