Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

What restoration projects have been undertaken on the USS Missouri since its decommissioning?

Checked on November 6, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important info or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive Summary

The dominant, well-documented restoration on the USS Missouri since decommissioning is a multi-stage main teak deck restoration completed in spring 2024 after a 14-year effort, costing roughly $6.0–6.2 million and covering over 48,000 square feet. Reporting across multiple outlets converges on the same basic facts—scope, timeline, labor, and state contributions—while leaving gaps about other post‑decommissioning projects and longer-term preservation plans [1].

1. The Big Finish: How the Teak Deck Project Concluded and What It Cost

Reporting places the final phase of the teak deck restoration in April–May 2024, with accounts noting the “final plank” was laid and the project declared complete after a 14‑year program. Coverage consistently quantifies the work as restoring more than 48,000 square feet of teak and attributes approximately $6 million to $6.19 million in total costs, with an estimated 68,514 man‑hours invested—figures repeated across the organization’s press release and local news recaps [1] [2]. The consistency in costs, area restored, and hours reported across pieces indicates a unified accounting of the project, though minor variations in how state contributions are described appear across stories.

2. Who Paid and Who Worked: Funding and Labor Details

Coverage identifies a mix of public and organizational funding for the deck work, with the State of Missouri contributing between $436,500 and $500,000 depending on the report, and the Battleship Missouri Memorial project accounting for the balance of the approximately $6.1 million tally [1] [3]. The labor investment is highlighted as substantial—tens of thousands of man‑hours—and described as a long, staged, weather‑sensitive undertaking to avoid disrupting visitors, which explains the protracted 14‑year schedule. This mix of state support and institutional stewardship reflects a preservation model that leverages public grants and nonprofit management, though reporting does not break down private donations, contractor vs. volunteer labor, or ongoing maintenance funding.

3. Why Teak? Historical Context and Preservation Rationale

Articles emphasize the historic significance of the teak deck—it was the platform for Japan’s formal surrender on September 2, 1945—and frame the restoration as essential to both structural integrity and interpretive authenticity for visitors [4]. Reports note the deck had deteriorated severely—plants growing through planks, temporary plywood trip hazards—making restoration necessary for safety and historical fidelity. Restoring the teak is presented as preserving the ship as a “living testament,” ensuring the physical narrative that visitors experience remains close to the ship’s wartime condition. Coverage does not, however, delve into conservation tradeoffs such as using modern materials or preservation techniques versus full historical replication.

4. Conflicting Details and Reporting Gaps Worth Noting

While core facts align, there are small inconsistencies in reporting: some pieces cite the project as completed in April 2024, others mark the final plank in May 2024, and state contribution figures vary slightly between $436,500 and $500,000 [1] [3] [2]. These differences likely reflect reporting on distinct milestones or funding rounds, but they point to the absence of a single, detailed public ledger in news coverage. Crucially, multiple accounts stress the deck project as the headline restoration while offering limited detail about other post‑decommissioning projects, such as systems overhauls, hull work, armament conservation, or interpretive exhibit restorations.

5. What Reporters Say Is Next—and What They Don’t Say

Some reports mention planned follow‑on work, notably restoration of the teak on the surrender deck slated to begin in an upcoming season, indicating that preservation on the Missouri remains ongoing rather than fully complete [3]. Beyond the teak work, reporting is sparse: there is little published detail on the ship’s overall maintenance schedule, drydock history since decommissioning, or investments in non‑deck systems. This gap means readers cannot form a full view of total restoration expenditures, timelines for mechanical or structural interventions, or how prioritized projects fit into long‑term conservation strategy.

6. Bottom Line: A Major Project with Clear Wins and Open Questions

The available, recent reporting draws a clear picture: the USS Missouri underwent a major, publicized teak deck restoration completed in spring 2024 that was materially supported by the State of Missouri and required significant time and labor [1] [2]. That project is a substantial preservation success, but media accounts leave unanswered questions about the full suite of post‑decommissioning restorations, long‑term maintenance funding, and the detailed accounting of contributors. Readers seeking a comprehensive inventory of all restorations since decommissioning should consult the Battleship Missouri Memorial’s official archival releases or nonprofit financial statements for line‑item project histories, as news coverage has concentrated on the high‑visibility teak effort.

Want to dive deeper?
What restoration work was done on USS Missouri after decommissioning in 1992?
Which organizations funded USS Missouri restoration and preservation projects?
What major restorations occurred on USS Missouri while a museum ship in Honolulu since 1998?
Has the USS Missouri received hull, superstructure, or electrical system overhauls and when?
How were World War II-era features and exhibits preserved or restored on USS Missouri (dates and contractors)?