What western assets are in russia
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Western corporate presence in Russia today spans thousands of registered firms, large energy and industrial holdings, consumer brands and service companies whose ownership, revenues and fates vary widely: recent data points to roughly 14,200 companies linked to Western owners (11,600 when Cyprus intermediaries are excluded) and revenues in the hundreds of billions of dollars as of 2023 [1]. Those assets have been reshaped by sales, rebrandings, seizures and legal workarounds, leaving a mixed picture of active Western operations, assets domestically sold or nationalized, and a Kremlin signalling that any re‑entry will be on Moscow’s terms [1] [2] [3] [4].
1. Scale and typology: how many and what kind of Western assets remain
Independent analysis of Russian corporate registries and commercial databases finds thousands of firms with Western links — The Insider counts 14,200 Western‑owned companies in early 2025, or 11,600 excluding Cyprus entities — and estimates Western‑linked 2023 revenues at about 17.3 trillion rubles ($203 billion) before exchange‑rate adjustments [1]. Those assets are not limited to small distributors: they include stakes in energy and power plants, pharmaceuticals, retail chains, automotive operations and oilfield services, reflecting decades of prior Western investment in Russia [1] [5] [6].
2. Sectors and headline names: energy, consumer goods and beyond
Energy and natural‑resource projects are among the most tangible Western exposures — companies like Uniper, Wintershall Dea and others historically held power plants, gas stakes and pipeline exposure, and Western players either retained book assets, transferred stakes to Russian partners or wrote down values [5] [3]. Consumer and retail brands have been subject to sales, rebrands or management transfers while some pharmaceutical and food companies continue operations under local subsidiaries or new ownership structures [6] [7].
3. How Western assets survived: sales, legal maneuvers and local ‘new Russians’
The corporate exodus after 2022 was often cosmetic: many firms used legal maneuvers, rebranding, paper transfers to local partners or intermediary structures to stay connected to the market, and Russian buyers — sometimes oligarchs and newly empowered domestic players — snapped up assets at discounted prices, creating a class of buyers described as “New Russians” acquiring former Western assets [7] [2]. Analysts and watchdogs document both outright sales under pressure and more opaque continuities of control through local proxies [7] [8].
4. Risks to Western assets: seizure, exit taxes and frozen claims
Moscow has used legal and administrative tools to seize or force sales of some Western assets — Fortum’s Russian division and other energy holdings have been affected — and Russia has imposed exit discounts and taxes on departing “unfriendly” companies, complicating exits and encouraging some firms to remain despite reputational costs [3] [8] [9]. At the same time Western policymakers are grappling with the fate of Russian assets frozen abroad and with concerns that Moscow could retaliate against blocked funds or confiscate assets in response to Western moves [10].
5. Political calculus: Moscow’s pitch for return — on Russian terms
Kremlin officials have publicly prepared frameworks to welcome the return of Western companies but with strict conditions designed to protect domestic control and extract concessions; officials say re‑entry would be considered only where “no risks for the economy” exist and with paperwork or incentives tilted toward Russian interests [4] [11] [12]. Western executives and analysts note the reputational, legal and sanction‑compliance hurdles that make a mass return unlikely without a political resolution and rollback of sanctions, even as some firms quietly explore options [13] [14].
6. Bottom line: a fractured landscape, not a single narrative
The current reality is neither wholesale Western abandonment nor uninterrupted Western control: evidence points to thousands of Western‑linked companies still operating in Russia in varying forms, large energy and industrial claims that have been written down, sold or seized, and an ongoing tug‑of‑war over ownership, profits and political leverage that will hinge on sanctions, legal claims and geopolitical calculation [1] [3] [8]. Reporting limitations remain: public tallies differ by methodology and intermediate ownership via offshore jurisdictions (notably Cyprus) obscures a precise audit [1].