Which branches of the U.S. military have cut ties with Scout organizations and when did those decisions occur?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Documents reviewed by NPR show Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is advancing plans to sever the U.S. military’s century‑old ties with Scouting America (the organization formerly known as the Boy Scouts), proposing bans on Scout meetings on military installations and ending support for the National Jamboree (reported Nov. 25, 2025) [1] [2]. Coverage of the draft memos and reactions by Scouting America and military spokespeople appear across outlets including NPR, Newsweek, Stars and Stripes and UPI, but the memos were described as draft or leaked and some DOD officials declined comment [2] [3] [4] [5].
1. What the reporting actually says: a draft plan to cut all Defense Department support
Reporting by NPR and outlets that cited NPR’s review says Hegseth prepared draft memos and a report to Congress proposing that the Pentagon “cease all support” for Scouting America, prohibit Scout troops from meeting on U.S. and overseas military bases, stop logistical and medical aid to the National Jamboree, and remove certain enlistment incentives tied to Eagle Scout status [2] [1] [4] [5]. These documents frame the rationale as institutional misalignment: the drafts assert Scouting America is “no longer a meritocracy,” has become “genderless” and is “attacking boy‑friendly spaces,” language attributed to Hegseth in the reporting [1] [4].
2. Timing and scope: when the decisions were reported and what would change
The public reporting of the draft plan surfaced in late November 2025, with NPR publishing the documents on Nov. 25, 2025 and other outlets following that day and the next [1] [2] [3]. The documents described are drafts not yet sent to Congress at the time of reporting and directed to heads of military branches to cease support—meaning the reported action is a Defense Department policy move under conceptual development rather than a completed, implemented removal of ties [2] [4].
3. Reactions from Scouting America and the public record
Scouting America responded with surprise and sadness, emphasizing its long relationship with the military and its support for military families; the organization said it has worked with every administration and remains nonpartisan [3] [6] [5]. Reporting notes the military has provided formal assistance to Scouting programs since 1937, underscoring the historical depth of the relationship the draft seeks to alter [1] [6].
4. Disagreement and context inside and outside the Pentagon
Multiple outlets report pushback and skepticism: a Pentagon spokesperson told Stars and Stripes the agency would not comment on leaked documents that could not be authenticated or which were pre‑decisional [4]. Newsweek and The Independent placed Hegseth’s draft within broader debates about DEI and “traditional values,” and noted earlier reporting (April 2025) that an adviser had suggested cutting ties as too “woke” [3] [7] [8]. Conservative outlets and commentators framed the move as restoring virtue and meritocracy, while Scouting leaders and some veterans emphasized practical benefits to military families and recruitment pipelines [9] [6].
5. What is certain and what is not in current reporting
Certain: multiple outlets cite the same set of draft memos and report Hegseth’s language and proposed actions to end support for Scouting America, with the reporting dated Nov. 25, 2025 [1] [2] [3]. Uncertain / not yet reported: final, official implementation of severing ties—military branches actually stopping on‑base meetings, withdrawing jamboree support, or changing enlistment incentives—had not been documented as completed actions in the stories; the documents were described as drafts and DOD officials declined substantive confirmation [2] [4].
6. Stakes and why this matters
The relationship has been institutional for nearly a century, with military installations historically providing logistics and medical support to Scouting events; changes would affect thousands of youth, many military families, and a pipeline of youth who historically have comprised a notable share of service academy cadets and enlistees [1] [6] [5]. The drafting of policy cuts sits at the intersection of national‑security messaging, recruitment concerns, and culture‑war debates over inclusion and DEI—an explicit agenda noted in the draft’s rationale and in contemporaneous commentary [2] [3].
Limitations: available sources do not mention whether Congress received a final memo, whether service branches individually acted after Nov. 25, 2025, or whether any court or statutory impediments would block a DOD policy change. All factual assertions above are drawn from the listed reporting [1]–[5].