Where is the video of rene goods wifes phone during the shooting

Checked on January 24, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Multiple news organizations have reported and circulated a cellphone video that appears to be from the ICE agent who shot Renée Nicole Good, but there is no verified public release of video filmed on the phone of Good’s partner (often referred to in reporting as Becca Good); instead reporting describes her as filming the encounter from the street and pointing her phone back at the agent, and investigators and journalists have obtained other vantage-point and agent-shot footage [1] [2] [3].

1. What footage has been publicly released so far:

A 37–47 second clip believed to be recorded on the ICE officer Jonathan Ross’s cellphone that shows the approach to Renée Good’s SUV and audio of the seconds before shots were fired has been published and obtained by outlets including Alpha News, NBC, CBC, CNN and others, and those outlets have described that footage as giving an up‑close perspective of the moments before the shooting [3] [2] [4] [5]. Multiple bystander and street‑camera angles have also circulated and been analyzed by news organizations, and those combined sources form the basis of the public record that investigators and reporters are using to reconstruct what happened [6] [7].

2. What reporting says about the wife filming at the scene:

Contemporaneous reports and the agent’s cellphone video show Good’s partner standing outside the vehicle, filming and at one point pointing her phone at the agent; outlets quote her words and describe her as actively recording on her mobile device immediately before and after the shooting [1] [7] [8]. News stories repeatedly note that she can be seen—or heard—filming and interacting with officers, and that bystanders also recorded the incident from other vantage points [3] [9].

3. Is the partner’s phone video available to the public?

There is no reporting in the provided sources that the partner’s phone footage has been released publicly or independently verified as published; the widely circulated short clip identified in reporting is attributed to the ICE agent’s phone, not to the partner’s device [3] [4]. Major outlets that obtained and verified the agent’s footage (NBC, CBC, CNN, Washington Post, ABC) make clear the agent’s phone video is the one that surfaced online via Alpha News; none of the reviewed reporting presents a separately released, authenticated video taken on the partner’s phone [2] [3] [5].

4. Could prosecutors, journalists or investigators have the partner’s phone footage even if it’s not public?

Some reporting says federal investigators seized items and are investigating the partner in connection with the incident, and NBC reported federal officials were interviewing and examining her possible involvement and seized items as part of the broader probe—reporting that implies investigators could now have access to her phone or its contents, though the articles do not publish confirmation that her phone footage has been obtained or released to the public [10]. Journalists who obtained the agent’s phone video have not stated they also obtained footage from the partner’s phone, and news organizations that analyzed the scene relied on the agent’s recording plus bystander footage rather than any partner-shot clip [2] [6].

5. Why this distinction matters and where the record currently stands:

The provenance of each clip matters because the agent’s video captures a particular angle and audio track that has shaped official narratives and political reactions, while a partner‑shot video could show different angles or moments; however, as of the cited reporting the only authenticated phone video publicly circulated and widely cited is the ICE officer’s, supplemented by other bystander recordings—there is no verified public release of video from Good’s partner’s phone in the sources provided [3] [4] [5]. Any claim that a partner’s phone video is publicly available should be checked against the major outlets that obtained and verified footage; those outlets attribute the key short clip to the agent’s phone, not to the partner’s device [2] [3].

Conclusion

The short answer: the publicly available cellphone video identified in reporting is the ICE agent’s recording; reporting documents that Good’s partner was filming at the scene but does not show or verify a released video taken on her phone—if investigators have seized that device or its footage, those materials have not been published in the sources reviewed here [3] [10] [4].

Want to dive deeper?
Has law enforcement publicly disclosed whether they seized footage from witnesses’ phones in the Renée Good investigation?
What different videos (agent, bystander, surveillance) have been authenticated and compared by major outlets in the Renée Good case?
How have political leaders and federal agencies framed the agent‑shot video, and what disputes exist over its interpretation?