Which Edgar Cayce predictions were explicitly dated for 2025 or 2026 in his readings?

1. What the A.R.E. (Association for Research and Enlightenment) materials show — prophetic themes, not precise 2025/2026 dates

Edgar Cayce’s organizational home, the A.R.E., presents a catalogue of “prophecies yet to come” and hosts programs titled around future years (for example, an essay/page tied to a “2026 Awakening” and event listings into January 2026), but the A.R.E. content in the provided set emphasizes broad prophetic themes (Hall of Records, shifts in consciousness, geographic watch-areas) rather than reproducing readings that say “in 2025” or “in 2026” verbatim ^{[1] [2] [5]}.

2. Secondary media summarize and dramatize Cayce but don’t supply direct dated readings

Mainstream and popular pieces collected here—such as a Medium retrospective and a book marketed as “Edgar Cayce Prophecies for 2025 and Beyond”—frame Cayce’s work as relevant to the mid-2020s and sometimes narrate striking images (NYC flooding, global upheaval) attributed to Cayce. Those items present interpretive summaries and promotional claims rather than providing primary readings that are explicitly dated to 2025 or 2026 in the texts you supplied ^{[6] [7] [3] [4]}.

3. Claims about New York depopulation or 2025 disasters appear in pop culture pieces, not source readings here

At least one site links a dramatic vision—New York City half-submerged or depopulated—to Cayce’s legacy in its roundup of “2025 predictions,” but that article does not reproduce the primary reading or cite a reading-number from the Cayce archive in these search results ^[7]. The available sources do not present the original Cayce reading text with a calendar-year claim that would establish an explicit 2025 timestamp.

4. Archive holdings exist but the provided inventory doesn’t supply date-stamped predictions for those years

The Edgar Cayce Foundation and A.R.E. maintain comprehensive collections of Cayce readings and case files (the foundation’s repository is cited in the materials), and event calendars run into 2026, but the provided repository description and event pages do not transcribe or point to any reading that explicitly assigns a prophecy to the years 2025 or 2026 in the documents we were given ^{[8] [5]}.

5. Two plausible reasons why explicit 2025/2026 dates aren’t appearing in these items

First, much Cayce material is phrased as general timelines, cycles, or symbolic markers (e.g., “when changes must be active in this sphere”), not modern calendar dates; the A.R.E. item on the Hall of Records illustrates that style ^[1]. Second, contemporary writers and event promoters often reframe Cayce’s imagery with present-year marketing (books titled “for 2025 and beyond,” event names using 2026) without claiming Cayce himself used those exact calendar years in the original trance readings ^{[3] [4] [5]}.

6. How to verify any claimed Cayce reading with a 2025/2026 date (next steps and caveats)

To confirm whether any reading explicitly named 2025 or 2026, consult primary reading transcripts in the Edgar Cayce archives or the Foundation’s repository (the collection referenced in these sources) and search reading text and reading numbers for year-specific language; the archive description indicates those original readings are catalogued and available for research, but the items provided here do not include such a transcript ^[8]. Beware of secondary summaries and promotional materials that retrofit Cayce imagery onto contemporary calendars without quoting reading numbers or original transcripts ^{[6] [7] [3]}.

Limitations and final note: the sources you supplied include organizational pages, event schedules, retrospectives and promotional books that connect Cayce’s themes to the mid-2020s, but they do not reproduce an original Cayce reading explicitly dated “2025” or “2026.” For a definitive answer, the primary readings collection or exact reading-number citations from the A.R.E./Edgar Cayce Foundation are the necessary next source — these are mentioned in the supplied materials but the specific dated readings are not present in this set ^{[8] [1]}.