Fact check: Theoretically, if ‘Elite’ and ‘Master’ can be defined as a skill level, which of these two levels would be higher than the other?

1. Summary of the results

The question of hierarchical placement between 'Elite' and 'Master' skill levels cannot be definitively answered based on the available analyses. The terminology lacks standardization across different domains and contexts ^[1]. Academic research specifically highlights the significant variability in how terms like "elite" are defined and applied, particularly in sports contexts ^[2].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Several crucial pieces of context are missing from the original question:

• The specific domain or field being referenced is not specified, which is critical as terminology varies significantly across different disciplines ^[2]
• There is no universal standardization of skill-level terminology across different contexts ^[1]
• The academic research shows that even within a single field (sports), there is significant inconsistency in how these terms are defined and applied ^[2]

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question contains an inherent assumption that:

• These terms can be universally ranked, when in reality their hierarchy depends entirely on the specific context, organization, or system using them
• The terms have standardized meanings, when research shows there is no consensus even within specific fields like sports ^[2]

Those who might benefit from promoting specific hierarchies of these terms include:

• Training organizations and certification bodies that sell courses/certifications using these titles
• Professional associations that use these designations to create membership tiers
• Educational institutions that offer programs with these titles

The key takeaway is that without specific context about the domain and system in question, no universal ranking between "Elite" and "Master" can be established.