Fact check: How factual is factually?

1. Summary of the results

The question "How factual is factually?" cannot be directly answered from most of the provided sources, as several of them contain non-relevant information or translations ^{[1] [2] [3] [4]}. However, one source provides important context about fact-checking in general, indicating that the process of determining factuality is complex and multi-layered ^[5].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original question overlooks several important aspects of fact-checking:

• Fact-checking involves both internal and external verification processes ^[5]
• There are multiple approaches to verifying factual accuracy ^[5]
• The effectiveness of fact-checking in correcting misinformation can vary significantly ^[5]

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question contains an inherent assumption that factuality can be measured on a simple scale, which is misleading. According to the available analysis:

• The process of verifying facts is more complex than a simple true/false determination ^[5]
• Different methodologies and approaches can lead to different conclusions about factuality ^[5]

This complexity benefits various stakeholders:

• Fact-checking organizations benefit from the perception that fact-checking is a straightforward process
• Media organizations benefit from presenting complex issues as simple binary choices
• Political actors can exploit the nuances and limitations of fact-checking processes to challenge unfavorable findings

The question itself might be better reframed to address the specific methodology and criteria used for determining factuality in any given context.