Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What notable predictions has Julie Green made that later came true or failed?
Executive summary
Reporting shows Julie Green has made multiple high-profile political prophecies that critics say failed: for example, she predicted King Charles “would never get the crown,” yet he was crowned on September 8, 2022 [1] [2]. She also predicted Donald Trump would be found “not guilty” in his hush-money trial and that the U.S. would be attacked for Trump’s “persecution”; when the trial produced a guilty verdict she defended or reinterpreted the prophecy [3] [4].
1. Who Julie Green says she is and how she prophesies
Julie Green is presented in media reports as a self-described prophet and leader of Julie Green Ministries International who posts regular prophecy videos and speaks at conservative gatherings; she says she receives messages from God—sometimes in the middle of the night—and publishes them to followers [5] [3] [6].
2. Prominent failed predictions cited by critics
Multiple outlets and commentators list high-profile missed predictions: that King Charles would “never get the crown” (he was crowned in 2022), that Herschel Walker would win his race (he lost), and various claims tied to Q-Anon–style conspiracies such as Joe Biden being dead or a “body double” being controlled by Barack Obama; these items are presented as examples of prophecies that did not come to pass [1] [2] [5] [4].
3. The Trump hush‑money prophecy and the public aftermath
Green publicly said God told her Trump would not be convicted—“there will be no guilty verdict”—and when the trial produced a guilty verdict she defended the prophecy, offering reinterpretations afterwards; news reporting treats that prediction as a notable miss and a subject of scrutiny [3]. Commentators argue repeated post-hoc explanations are typical when prophetic claims fail [4].
4. Accusations of extreme or conspiratorial claims
Rolling Stone and other outlets document Green making sensational allegations about public figures—e.g., claiming Nancy Pelosi engaged in child-harming rituals—and spreading conspiratorial assertions about Biden and other Democrats; such content has been characterized as “unhinged” or Q-Anon–influenced by critics [5] [6]. Newsweek reported Green promoted “dark connections” about Biden and other claims later described as false in follow-up pieces [6] [3].
5. Supporters’ claims and internal caveats
Some followers and forum posts defend Green, arguing many of her prophecies have come true and that critics misunderstand prophetic language; Green herself has reportedly said not all psychic predictions come true, a line used by some defenders to rationalize misses [1] [7]. Online exchanges show a divide between believers who emphasize hits and skeptics who emphasize failures [7] [2].
6. How commentators and religious critics frame the misses
Religious critics cite scriptural standards—that a single failed prophecy disqualifies a prophet—to label Green a false prophet; other observers frame her work as political theater that amplifies existing partisan hopes and grievances rather than reliable forecasting [8] [9]. Analysts warn that prophetic language mixed with politics can influence followers even when specific predictions fail [9].
7. What the available reporting does not establish
Available sources do not provide a systematic catalog of every Green prediction with a verified outcome; instead, reporting highlights several high-profile misses and controversial claims while quoting defenders who say some prophecies “have come true” [1] [7]. There is no single, comprehensive tally in the cited pieces that proves a consistent hit rate one way or the other [1] [2].
8. Bottom line for readers evaluating her record
Contemporary coverage shows Julie Green has made bold, politically charged prophecies that critics document as failed (King Charles’ coronation, the hush‑money verdict prediction, and other conspiratorial claims), while supporters insist some prophecies came true and point to ambiguities or reinterpretations when misses occur; the public record in these sources emphasizes controversy and disagreement rather than clear vindication [1] [3] [5] [7].