Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Are there documented dates for Julie Green's predictions (year and context)?
Executive Summary
Julie Green’s published prophecies include specific reception and publication dates spanning 2024–2025; the sources show concentrated activity in mid‑2025 and a cluster in September–October 2025. These dates record when she says she received words or when videos/posts were published, not verifiable timetables for the events she predicts, and the material mixes religious framing with politically charged allegations [1] [2].
1. Dates on the Record: What the ministry timestamps actually show
Julie Green Ministries posts multiple entries that explicitly record when a prophecy was “received” and when a related video or article was published. The provided documents list reception dates such as May 25, 2025; June 1, 2025; January 20, 2025; and February 15, 2024, while a separate set of listings displays a concentrated set of publication dates from September 21, 2025 through October 21, 2025 [3] [4] [2] [5] [1]. These timestamps are internal metadata and appear consistently across the site’s prophecy pages, indicating the ministry’s practice of dating prophetic words and accompanying media. The sources repeatedly distinguish between the date the word was received and the date of public posting, which is important for assessing the provenance and timeline of each prediction [1].
2. What the prophecies actually claim — recurring themes and named targets
Across entries, the content focuses on judicial upheaval, exposure of alleged crimes by public figures and institutions, and spiritual warfare tied to national destiny. Specific assertions include imminent judgment on U.S. judges and a shakeup in the Supreme Court, revelations of election fraud implicating Washington figures, and allegations against high‑profile private entities and families, including references to the Biden family, Epstein‑related matters, and Disney [4] [3]. The pattern combines scriptural framing with concrete political accusations, repeatedly promising that hidden evidence will surface and lead to arrests or removals. Multiple posts show the same thematic material restated across different dates, which suggests an ongoing narrative rather than one isolated forecast [4] [3].
3. Repetition and timing: clusters in 2025 versus earlier entries
The documentation shows two visible tempo shifts: a body of prophecies dated early to mid‑2025 (January, May, June) and a dense cluster labeled September–October 2025. The earlier dated items (January 20 and June 1, 2025, and May 25, 2025) present major claims about judicial judgment and capital “change,” with publication videos within days or weeks of reception [2] [4] [3]. The late‑2025 cluster lists multiple entries within a narrow window (9/21/25–10/21/25) and appears as a bulk archive of prophecies, which could reflect accelerated posting or retrospective compilation rather than independent predictive instances [1]. This temporal clustering matters because documented reception dates are discrete claims while publication clusters can amplify perceived frequency.
4. Context matters: religious language, evidentiary standards, and political effects
Julie Green’s texts routinely invoke scripture and spiritual jargon to justify or interpret political claims, framing secular crises as divine judgments. That framing changes how claims are asserted and evaluated: prophetic language treats revelations as authoritative insight rather than evidence‑based reporting. The sources themselves do not produce corroborating documentary evidence (e.g., court records, investigative findings) to substantiate the political allegations; they present the appearance of factual detail (names, institutions, “evidence will surface”) without independent verification [3] [4]. This blend of spiritual claim and political accusation increases the potential for the material to be interpreted as partisan messaging as much as prophecy.
5. Comparing sources and assessing what the dates actually prove
Cross‑checking the three provided source bundles shows consistent documentation of when Julie Green says she received prophetic words and when she published them, but no source supplies a dated, independently verifiable prediction fulfillment timeline. The entries establish provenance for the statements (who posted them and when), and show repetition of themes across dates from February 2024 through October 2025 [5] [1]. They do not, however, demonstrate that the predicted events occurred on the dates implied or within a measurable window; the dates are best read as publication metadata and claim‑timestamps rather than confirmations of outcome. Readers should treat the documented dates as accurate records of posting, and seek outside reporting or primary evidence if they need to evaluate whether any prophecy was borne out [4] [2].