Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What investigations or media reports have examined labor practices at Mar-a-Lago or similar private clubs?
Executive summary
Coverage of labor practices at Mar‑a‑Lago and other private clubs centers mostly on the Trump Organization’s repeated use of temporary guest‑worker visas and routine government wage‑and‑hour enforcement in the private‑club sector. Multiple news outlets reported the Trump Organization sought a record 184 H‑2A/H‑2B hires in 2025 and has increased its reliance on short‑term visas over the past decade [1] [2]; separate reporting documents earlier approvals and historical tallies of hires at Mar‑a‑Lago [3] [4].
1. The headline investigations and data-driven media reports
Major outlets — including Forbes, The Guardian, CNN, The Hill and The Daily Beast — have reported and analyzed Department of Labor and USCIS filings showing the Trump Organization’s strong and growing use of H‑2A/H‑2B and other temporary visa programs to staff Mar‑a‑Lago, golf clubs and a Virginia winery; Forbes and others cite roughly 184 requested workers in 2025 and multi‑year totals that run into the hundreds [2] [1] [5]. CNN’s review emphasized that positions such as bartenders and servers hired through the programs at Mar‑a‑Lago earn about $16 an hour with overtime eligibility [6].
2. What the government records actually show
Public Department of Labor and USCIS data cited in reporting show specific job categories and counts — for example, past filings listed waiters, cooks, housekeepers, clerks and “dining room captain” roles — and government approvals in earlier seasons ranged from dozens to more than a hundred temporary foreign workers for Mar‑a‑Lago [7] [8] [9]. Local coverage has repeatedly noted Mar‑a‑Lago appears among the higher‑volume private clubs in Palm Beach County for guest‑worker approvals [4] [7].
3. Investigations and enforcement in the private‑club sector more broadly
Independent of Mar‑a‑Lago, the Department of Labor and local authorities have pursued wage‑and‑hour and tipping‑related enforcement at clubs and adult entertainment venues — for instance, investigations into tip‑sharing and wage theft that led to license challenges and back‑wage orders at a Denver strip club and DOL enforcement findings at country clubs [10] [11]. Labor regulators and industry guidance also signal heightened scrutiny of worker classification (independent contractor vs. employee) that specifically affects clubs and similar employers [12] [13].
4. Legal and regulatory context that shapes investigations
Recent DOL and administrative attention — including a reinstated “economic realities” test for independent contractor classification and other rule changes — expand the avenues through which the DOL can investigate clubs for unpaid wages, overtime and misclassification [12] [14]. At the same time, federal and state enforcement capacity and priorities shift with administrations, which can affect whether and how quickly complaints about private clubs are investigated [15] [13].
5. Competing explanations offered in reporting
Journalistic coverage includes differing narratives: some outlets emphasize potential hypocrisy when an employer hires foreign guest workers while publicly advocating “hire American” policies, using the raw visa‑request numbers as the basis for critique [16] [1]. Other reporting — including statements from local workforce officials — frames guest workers as a response to genuine seasonal labor shortages in hospitality markets like South Florida, noting employers contend they cannot find enough local workers for peak winter months [6].
6. What the available sources do not cover or confirm
Available sources do not mention detailed, publicly released findings of systemic labor‑law violations at Mar‑a‑Lago specifically (for example, an agency‑issued back‑wage order naming Mar‑a‑Lago) beyond public filings for visa positions and counts; similarly, nationality details of foreign hires are not disclosed in the cited Department of Labor summaries [17] [2]. There is also no sourced, comprehensive study in this collection that compares labor‑law compliance outcomes at Mar‑a‑Lago to an industry‑wide baseline beyond isolated enforcement cases in the private‑club sector [11].
7. Takeaways for readers and journalists seeking follow‑ups
If you’re probing labor practices at Mar‑a‑Lago or comparable clubs, examine primary government filings (DOL labor certification notices; USCIS beneficiary lists where available) and DOL/EEOC enforcement databases for formal complaints or orders; note that news outlets have already synthesized those filings to produce the counts and pay‑rate context cited above [2] [6]. For broader sectoral trends, track DOL rule changes on classification and wage enforcement and local enforcement actions against clubs, which are documented in industry and legal analyses [12] [13].
Limitations: this summary uses only the provided reporting and government‑data‑based articles; it does not assert findings that the current documents do not state and flags where documents are silent [17] [11].