Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: Is project 2025 in effect
Executive Summary
Project 2025 is being implemented in part: multiple trackers and news reports show dozens to hundreds of its proposed actions have been completed or are in progress, and senior administration officials are using its blueprint in policymaking and executive actions [1] [2] [3]. However, sources disagree on scope and counts, and independent trackers show a mix of completed, in-progress, and unstarted items rather than a single “fully in effect” program [4] [1].
1. What supporters say: a blueprint turned into action
Supporters and sympathetic trackers frame Project 2025 as a functioning roadmap that the administration is actively using to shape policy across federal agencies. Detailed trackers compiled by advocacy groups and policy monitors list dozens of completed objectives—from civil service alignment to rescinded regulations—and show many items listed as “in progress,” suggesting an operational adoption beyond mere rhetoric [1]. These sources emphasize concrete steps such as executive orders and personnel changes that align with Project 2025 recommendations, portraying the project as a live playbook rather than a dormant agenda [3].
2. What critics highlight: partial implementation and political framing
Critics emphasize that while many recommendations have been advanced, Project 2025 is not a single, uniformly implemented program; it is a collection of proposals and priorities that are being selectively applied. Investigative and news outlets note variation in counts—some trackers report roughly a third to nearly half of objectives commenced—indicating significant progress but not wholesale execution [2] [4]. Critics also underscore that administration actions tied to the project are intertwined with broader political strategies, including budget fights and personnel moves, which complicates claims that Project 2025 alone drives policy changes [5].
3. Counting the wins: inconsistent tallies, similar signals
Different monitors report differing totals: one tracker lists 121 of 319 objectives completed with 66 in progress, while another reports 251 of 532 domestic actions completed, and external media cite figures of around 118 of 318 measures implemented with dozens ongoing [1] [2] [4]. The variation stems from differing definitions—what qualifies as a completed “objective” versus a related administrative action—and timing of updates. Despite these methodological differences, the consistent signal across sources is substantial activity consistent with Project 2025’s recommendations, even if exact totals vary [1] [2].
4. Key actors and mechanisms pushing implementation
Implementation has been driven largely by White House personnel and agency leaders who have authority to issue orders, rewrite guidance, and reorganize staff. Reports single out figures in budget and management roles as instrumental in translating the Project’s recommendations into executive actions and administrative decisions, lending institutional force to the blueprint [5] [3]. These personnel changes and directive powers allow selective, rapid adoption of recommendations without the need for full legislative enactment, which explains why many changes appear implemented through administrative means rather than through new laws [1].
5. The political context: shutdowns, messaging, and selective enforcement
News analyses note the administration has leveraged high-profile political events—such as government shutdowns and budget standoffs—to accelerate or highlight measures aligned with Project 2025, framing policy moves as both governance and political strategy. This context means some actions serve dual purposes: policy implementation and political messaging. Observers warn that framing tactical decisions as proof of full program implementation can overstate the permanence or comprehensiveness of changes that might be reversible through future administrations or court challenges [6].
6. What remains incomplete or contested
Even sources asserting substantial implementation acknowledge many recommendations remain unstarted or only partially executed. The presence of many “in progress” items and differing tallies indicates structural and legal limits, including personnel constraints, regulatory processes, and judicial review. Analysts stress that while administrative steps can realign agencies, enduring transformations—statutory rewrites, sustained program overhauls—require longer timelines and face political and legal resistance, so Project 2025’s full aspirations are not yet fully realized [2] [4].
7. How to read the disagreement: methods, motives, and timing
Differences across reports largely reflect methodological choices (which actions count as “implementation”), partisan vantage points, and update timing. Pro-implementation trackers highlight administrative completions; critics emphasize selective adoption and broader political motives. Because sources were published across 2025 (notably October and February items) and some lack precise dates, readers should treat counts as snapshots that evolve as trackers update and as new executive actions occur [2] [3] [4].
8. Bottom line for the question “Is Project 2025 in effect?”
The most defensible conclusion is that Project 2025 is actively informing and guiding many administration actions, with numerous recommendations implemented or underway; it functions as an influential blueprint rather than a single fully enacted law or uniform program. Claims that it is wholly “in effect” overstate the case, while claims that it has had no impact ignore substantial evidence of implementation across agencies and policy areas [1] [6].