Who is Julie Green and what is her background in prophecy?

1. A minister with a public prophetic brand — who is Julie Green?

Julie Green is publicly identified as the founder and primary speaker of Julie Green Ministries International and as a self‑proclaimed prophetess who began public preaching in the 2010s; she also served as an associate pastor at Faith Family Fellowship during the 2010s. Her ministry platform centers on daily podcasts, livestreams, and published prophecies that present purported revelations from God, and she portrays herself as a conveyor of direct spiritual messages to contemporary audiences. Biographical notes in profiles connect her family ministry roots and long‑term public preaching to the formation of her prophetic ministry ^{[2] [3] [4]}.

2. The content: prophetic pronouncements that mix scripture and politics

Green’s public prophecies regularly combine biblical language — warnings of judgment, end‑time themes, and calls to repentance — with specific political claims naming contemporary figures and institutions. Her messages have targeted elected officials and alleged plots, asserting that political leaders will be exposed or that legal actions will reverse, and she has released dated prophetic statements addressing presidents, members of Congress, and other public figures. The ministry’s published prophecies and daily broadcasts exemplify a theology that treats prophetic utterance as both spiritual counsel and political commentary ^{[5] [6] [1]}.

3. Political ties and platform: where she speaks and who listens

Reporting and event records link Green to right‑leaning, MAGA‑aligned networks and conferences where religious prophecy and nationalist politics intersect. She has appeared at ReAwaken America events and shared stages with prominent conservative figures, which observers use to characterize her prophecies as politically enmeshed rather than purely spiritual pronouncements. This proximity to partisan events shapes both her audience and the ways critics and supporters frame her credibility: supporters see prophetic corroboration of political aims, while critics see ideological amplification of unverified claims ^{[7] [2]}.

4. Track record under scrutiny: failed predictions and contested credibility

Multiple analyses document a pattern of high‑profile predictions that did not materialize, and commentators have invoked biblical criteria for testing prophecy to label her a false prophet. Journalistic reviews list specific predicted outcomes — about political defeats, deaths, or legal reversals — that failed to occur, and critics compare her to historical self‑styled prophetesses whose forecasts proved inaccurate. Supporters counter that prophetic language can be symbolic or conditional, but independent assessments emphasize the absence of verifiable hits and the presence of repeated public errors ^{[1] [7]}.

5. Organizational transparency and public records: what’s known and missing

Public organizational profiles provide structural details about Julie Green Ministries — including basic nonprofit identifiers and media activity — but official records do not comprehensively document theological training, formal prophetic credentials, or methodical verification of prophetic claims. CauseIQ and other listings supply EIN, staff, and location data, while the ministry’s own pages promote prophetic content, leaving a gap between organizational visibility and verifiable credentialing or archival verification practices for prophecies. This gap complicates efforts to independently validate prophetic claims beyond media reporting and the ministry’s own publications ^{[8] [3]}.

6. The contested bottom line: what to take away and what remains open

The available evidence establishes Julie Green as an active, media‑savvy prophetic minister whose public statements are closely entwined with contemporary politics and whose predictions have been repeatedly challenged for accuracy. Supporters present her as a prophetic conduit; critics present a record of failed or unfulfilled prophecies and politically aligned messaging that undermines credibility. Key open questions remain: systematic documentation of prophecy outcomes, independent corroboration of prophetic methodology, and fuller disclosure of training or denominational oversight — gaps that matter to anyone seeking to evaluate the reliability of her prophetic claims ^{[1] [9] [4]}.