How did the 2026 FPL numbers change compared with 2025 and what factors drove the adjustment?

Checked on December 3, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

HHS updates to the federal poverty guidelines pushed the baseline 2026 FPL amounts above the 2025 levels; those 2026 guidelines are indexed annually for inflation using CPI-based adjustments and are used with a one‑year lag for Marketplace subsidy eligibility (so 2025 FPL numbers determine most 2026 Marketplace and some Medicaid computations) [1] [2] [3]. The change drives higher dollar thresholds (with separate, higher figures for Alaska and Hawaii), alters affordability safe‑harbors (affecting the 9.96% ACA threshold and the $129.89 monthly safe‑harbor), and restores the traditional 100%–400% subsidy eligibility band for 2026 after temporary expansions expired [4] [5] [6].

1. What changed: the nominal FPL numbers rose and remain state‑differentiated

HHS issues new poverty guidelines each January and adjusts them for price changes (CPI‑U) so the 2026 poverty guidelines are higher than the 2025 guidelines; the guidelines explicitly include higher dollar figures for Alaska and Hawaii compared with the continental U.S. [1] [4]. Multiple reference tables published for program use show year‑over‑year increases and provide the per‑household size amounts that determine thresholds for programs such as Medicaid, CHIP and Marketplace subsidies [7] [8].

2. Practical effect: who sees eligibility and affordability move

Because premium tax credit eligibility for a plan year is calculated using the prior year’s FPL, eligibility for 2026 Marketplace subsidies is based on the 2025 poverty guidelines when consumers enroll — but states typically switch Medicaid/CHIP calculations to the new FPL between February and April, meaning many programs adopt 2026 FPLs in early 2026 [2] [3]. That timing means some consumers will be evaluated under different FPL sets depending on the program and the month of application [2].

3. Policy lever: inflation indexing and administrative timing drove the adjustment

HHS calculates the annual poverty guidelines by taking Census poverty thresholds and adjusting them for price changes (CPI‑U) between years; that inflation linkage is the direct driver of the year‑to‑year increase in dollar amounts [1]. Administrative practice — publishing guidelines in January but states applying them for Medicaid months later and using the prior year’s FPL for Marketplace advance credits — creates the one‑year lag that shapes who is affected and when [2] [3].

4. Knock‑on impacts: subsidies, affordability safe‑harbors, and program cliffs

The updated FPLs change income bands used by the Marketplace and employers: the ACA’s FPL affordability safe‑harbor for 2026 is calculated using the FPL figure and the IRS’s 9.96% threshold, producing a monthly safe‑harbor contribution of about $129.89 for self‑only coverage (calculated using the 2025 FPL when relevant) [5] [6]. The end of temporary expansions after 2025 means the expanded “no‑cap above 400%” subsidy rule expired and the traditional 100%–400% eligibility range applies for 2026 Marketplace subsidies unless Congress acts [6].

5. Conflicting timelines create confusion for consumers and employers

Guidance and analyses note divergent timetables: Marketplace subsidy determinations reference prior‑year FPLs, states often adopt new guidelines for Medicaid in March–April, and employers may use FPLs in effect within six months before a plan year to determine affordability safe‑harbors — all of which produce differing eligibility outcomes depending on timing and program [2] [5] [6]. Consumer advocates and navigators caution that these staggered changes complicate outreach and enrollment assistance during the 2026 Open Enrollment period [9].

6. What sources agree and where reporting differs

Government and policy sources agree the FPLs are updated annually using price adjustments and that Alaska/Hawaii figures exceed the mainland amounts [1] [4]. Health coverage‑focused outlets and employer‑side analyses emphasize different consequences: health policy writers focus on subsidy eligibility and program access [9] [6], whereas employer advisers concentrate on the affordability safe‑harbor math and plan design implications [5] [10]. Available sources do not mention a specific single dollar increase across all household sizes for 2026 versus 2025 in one consolidated table — you must consult the HHS or state charts for exact per‑household amounts [7] [8].

7. Bottom line for readers: check the relevant FPL and timing for your program

If you’re estimating Marketplace subsidy eligibility for 2026 coverage, use the 2025 poverty guidelines as described by multiple enrollment guidance sources; if you’re checking Medicaid/CHIP eligibility in spring 2026 or employer affordability calculations for certain plan years, expect to see the newly issued 2026 guidelines take effect and to rely on the FPL safe‑harbor math and the IRS 9.96% rate for 2026 [2] [5] [6].

Want to dive deeper?
What are the 2026 federal poverty guidelines by household size and state variations?
How did inflation and the 2025-2026 CPI influence the 2026 FPL update?
Which federal programs will change eligibility or benefit levels due to the 2026 FPL increase?
How do the 2026 FPL adjustments compare across US territories and Alaska/Hawaii?
What role did policy decisions, like legislation or federal agency rules, play in setting the 2026 FPL?