How were the 2026 poverty guidelines calculated and what inflation measures influenced the increase from 2025?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
The 2026 poverty guidelines were produced by HHS by taking the Census Bureau’s poverty thresholds and updating them for price changes using the Consumer Price Index (CPI‑U); the HHS web page says the January 2025 guidelines reflect price changes through calendar 2024 and are calculated by adjusting the 2023 Census thresholds with CPI‑U movements into 2024 [1]. Sources show policy debate about changing the methodology (H.R.1428 would replace CPI adjustments with a regional, expense‑based formula) but available sources do not mention any final switch for 2026 — HHS continued to use CPI‑U adjustments as described [1] [2].
1. How HHS actually calculates the guidelines: a mechanical CPI adjustment
HHS explains that the annual poverty guidelines are created by taking the Census Bureau’s poverty thresholds and adjusting them for price changes between years using the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI‑U). The agency’s public description says the January 2025 guidelines were calculated by taking the 2023 Census poverty thresholds and applying CPI‑U changes through 2024; accordingly those guidelines approximate the Census thresholds for calendar year 2024 [1]. That same ASPE page is the primary procedural explanation in the provided reporting [1].
2. Which inflation measure drove the increase from 2025 to 2026: CPI‑U through 2024
Because HHS uses the CPI‑U to update Census thresholds, the reported increase built into the guidelines that govern 2026 coverage is driven by CPI‑U movements covering the relevant update window (HHS says adjustments reflect price changes between 2023 and 2024 using CPI‑U) [1]. Reporting and HHS materials repeatedly identify CPI‑U as the index used for the update [1].
3. What the guidelines mean in practice: program timing and coverage year effects
The HHS poverty guidelines are used by a range of programs and often by one year behind for coverage determinations; for example, marketplace premium tax credits for coverage year 2026 are based on the 2025 poverty guidelines (multiple practical guides and program sites use the 2025 FPL numbers for 2026 coverage determinations) [3] [4]. State and federal programs convert the published guideline into percentages (100%, 138%, 400% etc.) to set eligibility thresholds; administrative materials note programs decide how to round and define units when applying the guidelines [5].
4. Competing viewpoints and proposed methodological change
There is active policy debate over whether CPI‑U is the right index. The Poverty Line Act of 2025 (H.R.1428) would change methodology away from a CPI‑based update to a regional, expense‑weighted approach that would account for food, clothing, utilities, transportation, rent, and health‑insurance costs and produce regionally adjusted guidelines (the bill text specifies those factors) [2]. The bill signals an explicit critique of the CPI‑U approach and an agenda to make the poverty line more sensitive to actual household expenditures, especially housing and health costs [2].
5. What the sources do not show and remaining limitations
Available sources do not mention HHS having adopted H.R.1428 or any other alternative methodology for the 2026 guidelines; ASPE’s description indicates the CPI‑U approach remained in use for the guidelines described [1] [2]. The provided materials do not include the numerical CPI‑U percentage change or a line‑by‑line breakdown of how much of the FPL rise was due to each component of the CPI‑U, so precise attribution of the dollar increase to specific price categories is not available in current reporting [1].
6. Practical takeaways and policy stakes
Because the guidelines are updated with CPI‑U, years with high consumer inflation will raise the poverty line and therefore shift eligibility thresholds upward; that affects Medicaid, CHIP, marketplace subsidies and other programs that base eligibility on FPL percentages [1] [4]. Lawmakers seeking to change indexing argue a consumption‑based, regional approach would better reflect household realities such as rent and health‑care costs (H.R.1428), while defenders of CPI‑based updating emphasize a simple, replicable national index [2].
Sources: HHS/ASPE explanation of methodology using CPI‑U [1]; practical use of 2025 guidelines for 2026 coverage and program notes [3] [4]; administrative rounding and program discretion note [5]; legislative proposal to change methodology and what it would use [2].