Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
59% illegals on snap
Executive summary
Claims that "59% of SNAP recipients are undocumented" misstate both the data source and SNAP eligibility rules: the 59% figure originates from a Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) analysis saying 59% of households headed by people in the U.S. illegally use at least one welfare program — not that 59% of all SNAP recipients are undocumented [1] [2]. Federal rules and multiple fact-checks note undocumented immigrants are not directly eligible for SNAP, and U.S. Department of Agriculture data show most SNAP participants are U.S.-born citizens [3] [4].
1. Origin story: where the "59%" number actually comes from
The 59% statistic circulated online traces to CIS’s analysis of Census Survey of Income and Program Participation data, which estimated that 59% of households headed by people in the U.S. illegally used at least one major public program (cash, food assistance, Medicaid, or housing) — not that 59% of SNAP participants are undocumented [1] [2]. Local fact-checking reporters flagged that social posts mischaracterized the CIS claim and conflated "use of any program" with exclusive SNAP receipt [1].
2. SNAP eligibility: law and agency guidance matter
Federal law and USDA guidance say undocumented noncitizens are not eligible for SNAP, and program rules restrict direct SNAP participation to U.S. citizens and certain lawfully present noncitizens [3] [4] [5]. That leaves mixed-status households as the main pathway through which someone without lawful status might be connected to SNAP benefits — typically by being a nonparticipating household member while U.S.-born children receive benefits on the household's EBT card [6] [4].
3. The actual composition of SNAP recipients
Department of Agriculture data and independent fact-checks report that the overwhelming majority of SNAP recipients are U.S.-born citizens; one fact-check summarized that nearly 90% of recipients are U.S.-born citizens and 95.6% when including naturalized citizens [3]. Newsweek and other outlets likewise note noncitizens account for only a small fraction of SNAP recipients and, historically, noncitizens participate at lower rates than citizens [7].
4. Why confusion keeps spreading: data categories and household definitions
Confusion stems from several overlapping issues: (a) different analyses count "households headed by undocumented immigrants" versus "individual SNAP participants"; (b) households can include both eligible (U.S.-born) and ineligible members, so program receipt is reported at the household level; and (c) advocacy or policy groups may highlight particular metrics (use of "one or more programs") that are easily misread as program-specific statistics [2] [1] [6]. Fact-checkers warn that treating a statistic about one subgroup as representative of the entire SNAP caseload is a categorical error [4].
5. Competing viewpoints and their incentives
Center for Immigration Studies frames high welfare-use rates among households headed by undocumented immigrants as evidence of fiscal pressure and a rationale for restrictive immigration policy [2] [6]. By contrast, media outlets, researchers, and fact-checkers emphasize legal ineligibility and data showing citizens dominate SNAP rolls, often to counter misinformation and to stress program integrity concerns [3] [7] [4]. Advocacy groups on both sides have incentives: immigration‑restriction groups to highlight costs tied to immigration, and pro‑benefits or immigrant-advocacy voices to stress children's eligibility and humanitarian needs [2] [7].
6. Recent policy changes that affect counts and access
The One Big Beautiful Bill (OBBB) of 2025 enacted changes to SNAP alien eligibility effective July 4, 2025, and USDA/FNS issued implementation guidance requiring states to apply new criteria to applicants and recertifications — a change that will alter who can receive benefits going forward and could affect future statistics [8]. Politico and other reporting note that the 2025 law tightened eligibility and will remove some lawful immigrants from SNAP, which matters when interpreting year‑to‑year comparisons [9].
7. Bottom line for readers trying to assess the claim
Available reporting shows the 59% figure does not mean 59% of SNAP recipients are undocumented; instead it refers to welfare use among households headed by undocumented people, a narrower and different metric [1] [2]. USDA data and multiple fact-checks find most SNAP recipients are U.S. citizens, and undocumented people are generally not directly eligible for SNAP — though mixed-status households and recent policy changes complicate the picture [3] [4] [8]. When you see a headline citing a percentage, check whether it describes households versus individual beneficiaries, and whether it counts "any program" versus SNAP specifically [1] [2] [4].