What actions has Congress or the Biden administration taken to extend or protect subsidies?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Congress and the Biden administration created enhanced Affordable Care Act (ACA) premium tax credits via the American Rescue Plan Act in 2021 and extended them through 2025 in the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022; those enhanced subsidies are scheduled to sunset Dec. 31, 2025 unless Congress acts [1] [2]. In late 2025 Congress and the White House negotiated votes and proposals — including a Senate pledge for a December vote and White House draft plans for short extensions or reforms — but a clean, bipartisan permanent extension remained uncertain as of these reports [3] [4] [5].
1. What Congress has done so far: legislated temporary enhancement and delayed a decision
Congress enacted the enhanced premium tax credits (PTCs) in ARPA 2021 and later extended those enhancements through 2025 in the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022; the enhancement removed the 400% FPL income cap and reduced required household premium contributions for eligible enrollees [1] [2]. Facing the impending Dec. 31, 2025 sunset, Senate leaders negotiated a deal tied to ending a government shutdown that secured a Senate vote on a subsidy extension by mid-December but did not guarantee a House vote or enactment, leaving the fate of the subsidy changes unresolved [3] [4]. Congressional budget documents and reporting make clear that the core PTC authority remains permanent but the temporary enhancements will expire unless Congress passes additional legislation; without action, the pre-ARPA rules (including the 400% FPL cap) would resume in 2026 [6].
2. What the Biden administration did or proposed to protect subsidies
The Biden administration originally championed the ARPA expansion in 2021 and supported extensions thereafter; according to reporting, the White House circulated a draft plan in late 2025 that would have extended enhanced subsidies for two years while adding conservative-favored limits — an unannounced proposal that was later publicly contested [5] [7]. Administration officials and Democratic lawmakers pushed to make the enhancements permanent or at least delay the sunset, arguing officials warned of steep premium increases and higher uninsurance if the enhancements lapse — projections cited by nonpartisan groups and CBO warn big premium and coverage impacts absent extension [8] [6].
3. Compromise attempts and competing GOP approaches
After the government funding standoff, Senate Republicans agreed to give Democrats a vote on an extension as part of the deal to reopen the government, but GOP leaders and some conservatives opposed a straight extension and sought reforms such as reinstating an income cap, eliminating fully free plans, or creating Health Savings Account (HSA)-linked alternatives; President Trump publicly said a full two-year extension was not his preference while leaving open narrower options [5] [7]. Multiple reports describe a fragmented Republican position — some moderates want to avert premium shocks for their constituents while others view the enhanced credits as excessive spending or prone to fraud — making a clean, bipartisan extension unlikely without concessions [3] [2].
4. Near-term procedural steps and political math
The deal to end the shutdown included a pledge that the Senate would vote on a Democrat-authored bill to extend subsidies by early to mid-December; several outlets reported the Senate vote was forthcoming but that passage in the House was far from guaranteed, especially after some Democrats joined Republicans to reopen government without a subsidy guarantee [3] [4]. Analysts and advocacy groups estimate that letting the enhanced PTCs lapse could raise premiums materially and increase the uninsured population by roughly two million, numbers Democrats used to press urgency for legislative action; Congressional Budget Office and other scorekeepers also produced multi-hundred-billion-dollar cost estimates for longer extensions, which shaped Republican resistance [8] [2].
5. What happens if lawmakers don’t act — mechanics and consequences
Legislative and CRS analyses explain that the PTC itself continues beyond 2025 but the temporary ARPA/IRA enhancements expire, meaning eligibility reverts to the 400% FPL cap and higher applicable percentages — resulting in smaller subsidies and projected premium increases [6] [1]. Reporting cites independent analysts (KFF, CBO) saying premiums could surge and millions could lose subsidies or coverage if the enhanced credits lapse; meanwhile opponents frame the extension as costly, pointing to CBO scoring that a decade-long extension could add hundreds of billions to deficits [8] [2].
Limitations: available sources do not mention final congressional action beyond the pledged December vote or an enacted law extending the enhanced PTCs past December 31, 2025; this account relies on late-2025 reporting and CRS explanation of statutory mechanics [3] [6].