Did Republicans pass laws in regards to illegal immigrants being able to get an IHSS worker?

1. What the recent Republican federal changes actually do: narrow eligibility for “noncitizen” groups

Republican legislative actions described as tightening “alien Medicaid eligibility” narrow federally funded Medicaid/ACA access for certain noncitizen groups who had been considered “lawfully present” (for example, refugees, some asylees and other categories) — not by creating universal federal coverage for people without legal status, but by limiting which lawfully present immigrants are eligible for federal subsidies ^{[5] [1]}.

2. Undocumented immigrants and federal programs: long‑standing federal limits remain

Multiple policy analysts and fact-checkers report that people in the U.S. without lawful status are generally ineligible for federally funded Medicaid, CHIP and ACA subsidies; emergency care remains required under EMTALA and emergency Medicaid can cover stabilizing hospital care, but routine federally funded coverage for undocumented immigrants is not established federal policy ^{[1] [2] [3]}.

3. The dispute over Democrats’ proposals and Republican messaging

Republicans have characterized Democratic attempts to repeal parts of the Republican law as enabling “health care for illegal immigrants.” But reporting and fact checks show the Democratic rollback would largely restore eligibility for lawfully present immigrants who lost coverage under the Republican changes, not grant federal coverage to undocumented immigrants ^{[2] [5] [6]}.

4. Why the “illegal immigrants get IHSS workers” framing is not in the sources

The set of documents you provided does not mention IHSS (In‑Home Supportive Services) or any federal or state law that explicitly authorizes undocumented immigrants to receive IHSS home‑care workers. Available sources do not mention IHSS in this debate, and federal materials and fact checks focus on Medicaid/ACA eligibility and state-funded coverage rather than IHSS specifically (not found in current reporting; ^[1]; ^[8]2).

5. State actions and funding workarounds complicate the picture

Some states — notably California in GOP attacks — have used state funds or complex financing mechanisms to provide health services to undocumented immigrants; Republicans and the Trump administration have challenged those arrangements and sought to claw back federal dollars they say were improperly used, while state officials dispute those claims ^{[4] [7]}. KFF and other analysts note earlier Republican proposals tried to penalize states that funded coverage for undocumented people, but those penalties didn’t always survive into final bills ^[1].

6. Fact‑checking the headline claims: where reporting converges and diverges

Independent outlets (KFF, BBC, Snopes, FactCheck) converge on the point that federal eligibility for undocumented immigrants remains limited and that much GOP messaging overstated who would gain coverage; Republicans framed reversals of the GOP law as giving benefits to undocumented migrants, but analyses show the changes mainly affect lawfully present populations and state‑only programs ^{[2] [5] [1] [6]}. Republican sources and committee communications press larger dollar figures and broader claims about “illegal aliens” getting taxpayer-funded care — claims disputed by the other outlets ^{[8] [9] [10]}.

7. Practical effect on home‑care services like IHSS: what we can and cannot say from these sources

The material supplied describes federal Medicaid/ACA eligibility shifts and political disputes, but it does not document a federal statute or Republican law that explicitly grants undocumented immigrants access to IHSS home‑care workers. Whether an undocumented person can receive IHSS depends on state program rules and funding sources; the sources here do note states can provide coverage using only state funds, which some states do, but they don’t mention IHSS by name ^{[1] [4] [3]}.

8. Bottom line for your original query

Republican federal laws and budget changes have tightened eligibility for certain immigrant categories within federally funded programs — but reporting and fact checks say these laws do not open routine federal Medicaid/ACA coverage to undocumented immigrants, and your provided sources do not show Republicans passing a law specifically allowing undocumented people to get IHSS workers ^{[1] [2] [3]}. If you want confirmation about IHSS specifically, consult California state statutes, county IHSS rules or state-level reporting; those items are not in the documents you provided (not found in current reporting).