Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What percentage of SNAP recipients are employed full-time in 2022 or 2023?
Executive Summary
Two different readings of the available analyses produce sharply different answers: one set finds that a large share of adult SNAP recipients who report wage income work full time, while another finds that only a small share of SNAP households contain a full‑time worker at the time of benefit receipt. Reconciling these claims requires distinguishing measures (individual adults vs. households, full‑time every week vs. presence of a full‑time worker at point of receipt, annual earnings vs. monthly snapshot) and recognizing that SNAP participation fluctuates with employment instability, part‑year work, and differing household compositions [1] [2] [3] [4] [5].
1. Conflicting headlines: Big percentages of working adults versus tiny shares of households with full‑time workers
Analyses present two conflicting headline claims: a 2023 article reports that among adult wage earners who are SNAP recipients, 70 percent worked full‑time every week and more than half worked the full or nearly full year, framing SNAP as supporting many working households [1]. By contrast, a 2023 analysis of SNAP Quality Control data concludes only about 6 percent of SNAP households contained a full‑time worker at the time of SNAP receipt, suggesting that most recipients are not full‑time employed when receiving benefits [2]. These statements are not directly contradictory if one recognizes they measure different populations and timeframes: one looks at adults who reported wage income over a period and the intensity of that work, the other looks at a point‑in‑time household snapshot of employment status. Without aligning definitions—full‑time by hours, full‑year employment, adult versus household unit, or point‑in‑time receipt—numbers will diverge [1] [2].
2. What the USDA household characteristics say about earnings and employment presence
USDA summary reports for FY2022 and analyses referenced here indicate that roughly a quarter to a third of SNAP households report countable earned income or earnings in a given year—25.7 percent in one FY2022 summary and roughly 28 percent in related reporting—while reports also note higher earned‑income prevalence among households with children (about 50–55 percent in some snapshots) [3] [5]. Those statistics speak to household earnings prevalence across the year, not necessarily to full‑time employment at the moment of benefit receipt. USDA reporting emphasizes average monthly earned income levels (around $1,450–$1,548 in cited analyses), which implies many working recipients have low or unstable hours and earnings even when employed, a key reason SNAP serves working households [3] [5].
3. Center on Budget and Policy Priorities: most working‑age participants work, but instability matters
The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities frames the picture differently: most working‑age, non‑disabled SNAP participants do work at some point, with high shares reporting earnings in a calendar year (CBPP cites figures such as 74 percent working in 12 months before/after a reference month and 83 percent with earnings for certain subgroups), but job instability and part‑year participation mean point‑in‑time unemployment overstates non‑work [4]. This view highlights that annual or episodic employment rates can be high even when point‑in‑time full‑time employment is low, and therefore policy conclusions differ depending on whether the focus is on poverty reduction across a year or on instantaneous labor force attachment [4].
4. Why methodology changes the headline: households, adults, timing, and definitions
The diverging conclusions stem from at least four methodological pivots: whether the unit is the household or an adult, whether “full‑time” means 35+ hours every week, full‑year employment, or simply having any full‑time job during the year, and whether the measure is a point‑in‑time SNAP receipt snapshot versus an annualized earnings view. Analyses here explicitly note that high effective marginal tax rates, variable schedules, and part‑year work both increase SNAP reliance among workers and complicate measuring true work intensity [2] [1] [4]. Researchers and policymakers reach different conclusions because they prioritize different outcome frames: labor market attachment, income volatility, or program eligibility dynamics [2] [1].
5. What can be said confidently, and what remains unanswered for 2022–2023
Confident facts from the provided analyses: a substantial share of SNAP households report some earned income across a year (roughly 25–28 percent in cited USDA summaries, and higher among households with children), and many working‑age SNAP participants have earnings in the year even if they lack a full‑time job at the moment they receive benefits [3] [5] [4]. What remains unresolved in these analyses is a single, directly comparable percentage that answers “what share of SNAP recipients were employed full‑time in 2022 or 2023” because the studies use differing definitions and timeframes; the contrasting claims of 70 percent of wage‑earning adults working full‑time [1] and 6 percent of households containing a full‑time worker at receipt [2] illustrate that absence of a harmonized measure.
6. Implications for interpretation and policy debates
For stakeholders and policymakers, the takeaway is that both narratives are partially true: many SNAP recipients work during the year and many working households still need benefits due to low wages and instability, while point‑in‑time measures show relatively few households have a full‑time worker when receiving SNAP. Each statistic can be used to justify different policy responses—wage and scheduling reforms, benefit rules and work requirements, or anti‑poverty supports—and analysts must state definitions and timing up front to avoid misleading comparisons [1] [2] [4] [3].