Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

How do states handle residents who decline to obtain Real ID — alternatives and consequences?

Checked on November 23, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important info or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

States generally let residents refuse a REAL ID — your standard state license continues to work for driving, voting and many everyday uses — but after May 7, 2025 federal checkpoints (airports, some federal facilities, nuclear plants) will require a REAL ID or an accepted alternative such as a passport, passport card, enhanced IDs, military IDs or other TSA‑listed documents [1] [2] [3]. For travelers who show up without an acceptable ID, TSA offers an identity‑verification process and (as of late 2025 rulemaking) a paid modernized alternative identity verification option; that process can delay or deny entry through security [2] [4].

1. What “declining” REAL ID means in practice — states still issue non‑REAL IDs

Most state DMVs continue to issue a standard (non‑REAL ID) driver license or ID and explicitly say you are not required to get a REAL ID; those standard cards remain valid for driving, voting and many everyday state‑level functions (examples: Michigan, Washington, New Jersey guidance) [5] [6] [7]. State materials emphasize the choice: you can opt for a REAL ID or keep a standard card, but if you keep the standard card you’ll need an alternate federally accepted ID to enter certain federal sites or board domestic flights [7] [6].

2. Where the federal consequences kick in — airports and selected federal sites

The federal REAL ID requirement applies to accessing federal facilities, entering nuclear power plants, and boarding commercial aircraft; beginning May 7, 2025 travelers who rely on a non‑compliant state license must present an acceptable alternative or they risk extra screening or denial at TSA checkpoints [2] [1]. DHS/TSA enforcement has been phased and flexible in prior rulemaking, but the underlying restriction is that federal agencies will not accept noncompliant IDs for those listed purposes [8] [2].

3. List of common alternatives — passports, enhanced IDs, military and more

TSA’s published list of acceptable alternatives includes a U.S. passport book or card, U.S. passport card, U.S. Department of Defense ID (including dependent IDs), certain immigration documents (e.g., employment authorization card), Enhanced Driver’s Licenses (issued by a handful of states), tribal IDs and other federally specified credentials [1] [3] [9]. Several news outlets and consumer guides compiled the same list and advise travelers to check TSA before travel because the list can change [10] [11] [12].

4. What happens at the checkpoint if you don’t have REAL ID or an alternative

TSA may notify non‑compliant travelers, direct them to a separate area, and require identity verification that can include collecting personal info and additional screening; if identity is confirmed travelers may be allowed to the screening checkpoint but could face significant delays and there is no guaranteed outcome [13] [10] [11]. UpgradedPoints and local reporting stressed that the process is discretionary and can be time‑consuming, so arriving early is recommended [14] [11].

5. Newer development: a paid modernized alternative verification program

Federal rulemaking published in late 2025 establishes a “modernized alternative identity verification” program that is optional, does not guarantee access to the sterile area, and carries an $18 fee to recoup government costs — a formalization of the checkpoint verification pathway for people without acceptable ID [4] [15]. This change shifts some of the burden onto the traveler who elects not to carry a federally accepted credential.

6. State-level variations and political context

Some states emphasize protections for residents who decline REAL ID, framing standard licenses as adequate for state functions and daily life; a few states also issue Enhanced IDs that meet federal needs without the REAL ID star [5] [16] [9]. Advocacy and privacy groups have opposed REAL ID on civil‑liberties grounds; others argue the law strengthens document security. Coverage shows competing priorities: states balancing resident convenience and privacy versus federal goals for uniform identity standards [17] [16].

7. Practical advice and limitations of current reporting

If you decline REAL ID and plan to fly, carry a passport or another TSA‑accepted credential, or be prepared for identity verification at checkpoints and potential delays [1] [11]. Sources do not provide exhaustive examples of every outcome at every airport nor do they guarantee uniform treatment across federal facilities; local airport and agency practices vary and enforcement arrangements have been adjusted over time [2] [8]. Available sources do not mention long‑term criminal penalties for declining REAL ID; they focus on access and screening consequences [2] [5].

Bottom line: keeping a non‑REAL state ID remains legal for many everyday state uses, but it shifts the burden to the individual when interacting with federal checkpoints — plan to carry an accepted federal credential or allow extra time for TSA verification [6] [1] [11].

Want to dive deeper?
What acceptable alternatives do states offer for identification if someone refuses Real ID?
How do state-issued noncompliant driver's licenses differ in travel and federal use restrictions?
Can residents without Real ID still board domestic flights or enter federal buildings, and what exceptions exist?
What are the legal and practical consequences for using a non-Real ID to access federal services or cross borders?
Have any states passed laws or policies protecting residents who opt out of Real ID, and what do those laws do?