What is the racial/ethnic breakdown of SNAP recipients in the United States in 2024?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
USDA data for fiscal year 2023–2024 show that whites are the largest single racial group of SNAP recipients — about 35–37% — followed by Black/African American (about 25–26%) and Hispanic (about 15–16%); overall SNAP served roughly 41.7 million people (12.3% of U.S. residents) in FY2024 [1] [2]. Multiple fact‑checks and reporting outlets warn that viral charts claiming immigrants or particular nationalities dominate SNAP are misleading because they misread or mix data sources [1] [3].
1. White Americans are the largest racial group on SNAP — but not a majority
USDA reporting and contemporary fact‑checks identify White recipients as the largest racial group on SNAP at roughly the mid‑30s percent — cited as about 35.4% in one fact check and broadly reported as 35–37% in other summaries — meaning whites constitute the plurality but well under 50% of participants [1] [4]. Those figures come from the USDA characteristics reporting and corroborating analyses; the Economic Research Service separately documents program size at about 41.7 million average monthly participants in FY2024 [2].
2. Black and Hispanic participants form the next largest shares
USDA data and NGO summaries place Black/African American recipients around the mid‑20s percent (about 25.7% in the USDA‑cited breakdown) and Hispanic recipients around the mid‑teens (about 15–16%) [1] [5]. These proportions reflect the racial/ethnic composition of people who use the program, not eligibility rules or causes of need; commentators such as the Economic Policy Institute emphasize that SNAP reduces racialized poverty because many beneficiaries are people of color [6].
3. Data limitations: “unknown” race and classification choices matter
USDA reporting and independent fact‑checks note an important limitation: a non‑trivial share of participants have unknown or unreported race in administrative or survey files — PolitiFact notes about 17% of participants fall into an unknown category in the dataset it cited [1]. That missingness, plus differences in how sources classify race and ethnicity (for example, Hispanic as an ethnicity separate from race) means headline percentages change depending on the dataset and coding choices [1] [5].
4. Beware viral charts that reclassify nationality as “race”
Several reputable outlets debunked viral graphics that presented nationalities (Afghan, Somali, Iraqi) as if they were the dominant SNAP groups; the USDA does not collect recipient nationality in the same detail and the visualizations misapplied American Community Survey filters and labels, producing fabricated impressions [3] [1]. Al Jazeera and PolitiFact both emphasize that the reliable, program‑level demographic breakdowns come from USDA reports and that much online content conflates different datasets to mislead [3] [1].
5. Scale of the program matters for context
SNAP served an average of approximately 41.7 million people per month in FY2024, equivalent to about 12.3% of U.S. residents; that scale shapes debates about racial impacts because program users are spread across all regions and demographic groups [2]. Policy changes — for example, emergency allotments during COVID, later unwinding of continuous eligibility, or state variations in administration — have shifted enrollment levels, which can affect yearly demographic snapshots [4] [2].
6. Competing narratives: policy framing and political agendas
Advocates and researchers frame SNAP as an anti‑poverty tool that disproportionately benefits people of color in poverty reduction, while some political actors amplify claims that immigrants or specific racial groups dominate program usage. Sources from advocacy groups (EPI, FRAC) underscore racial equity impacts, whereas fact‑checkers and mainstream outlets focus on correcting falsehoods about immigrant dominance — both angles are present in the record and driven by different agendas [6] [5] [1].
7. What reporters and researchers should do next
Reporters and analysts must cite the USDA characteristics report and ERS participation figures when discussing racial breakdowns, explicitly note the share of “unknown” race, and avoid mixing ACS subgroups or nationality labels with program administrative categories without clear documentation [2] [1] [3]. Available sources do not mention a definitive, fully disaggregated 2024 racial/ethnic table that resolves all classification and unknown‑race issues; users should treat mid‑30s for whites, mid‑20s for Black Americans, and mid‑teens for Hispanics as the best current estimates grounded in USDA reporting and independent fact checks [1] [5].
Limitations: these conclusions rely on USDA FY2023/FY2024 reporting and subsequent fact‑checks; datasets differ in classification and missingness, and online graphics have frequently misused ACS or other data to produce misleading claims [1] [3].