What states have the fastest-growing or declining SNAP caseloads since 2020?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Federal SNAP participation rose sharply during the pandemic and remains uneven across states: Massachusetts’s caseload is still 42% above its pre‑pandemic level, a specific example cited in recent local reporting [1][2]. Nationally, USDA/FNS publishes state-by-state SNAP data tables that are the authoritative source for exact growth or decline figures since 2020; analysts such as CBPP have tracked that most states saw caseloads fall after pandemic peaks while a few states showed continued growth [3][4].
1. Where to get the definitive state-by-state numbers — use USDA/FNS data
For any claim about which states have the “fastest‑growing” or “fastest‑declining” SNAP caseloads since 2020, the SNAP Data Tables maintained by USDA’s Food and Nutrition Service are the primary source and should be consulted for month‑by‑month and year‑to‑year recipiency figures [3]. Journalists and researchers must rely on those tables to produce ranked lists because media reports and think‑tank summaries interpret but do not replace the underlying FNS counts [3].
2. National trend: a pandemic spike, then uneven declines
After the COVID‑19 shock, SNAP participation surged; subsequent years saw overall declines in most states as temporary pandemic policies ended, though timing and depth of declines varied by state [4]. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities has documented that between 2013 and 2018 caseloads fell in nearly every state, and that post‑2020 dynamics likewise produced widespread declines from pandemic peaks even as some states bucked the trend [4].
3. Example — Massachusetts: sustained elevated caseloads and administrative strain
Local reporting highlights Massachusetts as a case where caseloads remain far above pre‑pandemic levels: Massachusetts’s SNAP caseload is reported as 42% higher than before the pandemic, driven by higher food costs, economic strain and state outreach to Medicaid recipients — and the state’s agency faces staffing shortfalls that complicate service delivery [1][2]. That single‑state figure demonstrates how state policy and administrative capacity shape caseload trajectories as much as macroeconomic conditions [1][2].
4. Why some states grow while others decline — policy and economic drivers
State caseload change reflects multiple drivers: local economic conditions, outreach and enrollment policy changes, eligibility expansions (for example California’s earlier CalFresh expansions) and the cessation of pandemic emergency allotments and temporary boosts to benefits [5][6][7]. CBPP and other analysts emphasize that policy choices — not just unemployment or poverty rates — help explain why a few states experienced growth even as most saw declines after 2020 [5][4][7].
5. What existing analyses say about which states moved most — limited specifics in provided sources
The provided material does not supply a ranked, post‑2020 list of the fastest‑growing or fastest‑declining states. CBPP notes that in prior multi‑year comparisons Nevada stood out with notable growth in the share of population on SNAP during an earlier period, but that observation (about ~12% growth in that earlier window) predates and is not a comprehensive post‑2020 ranking [4]. To identify current leaders and laggards since 2020, analysts must extract state series from USDA/FNS tables and calculate percentage changes [3][4].
6. Methodological notes: how to measure “fastest‑growing” or “declining”
Different measures produce different answers: count change (raw persons or households), percentage change, or change in share of state population can reorder states substantially. Caseload volatility in small states can produce large percentage swings that overstate policy importance; large states can move national totals even with modest percentage changes [4][3]. Researchers should state the metric used and present both absolute and relative changes from the same USDA/FNS dataset [3][4].
7. Practical next steps for readers who want a state list
To produce a verified ranking: download the USDA/FNS SNAP Data Tables, extract each state’s monthly or annual recipient counts for 2020 and the latest available month, compute percent and absolute changes, and then rank states by the chosen metric [3]. For context on drivers, pair those numbers with state policy notes from CBPP and state reports — for example, Massachusetts reporting on a 42% rise illustrates how state outreach/administration matters [3][1].
Limitations and caveats: the sources provided include the USDA/FNS data portal and analytic context from CBPP and state reporting but do not include a ready‑made ranked list of fastest‑growing/declining states since 2020; therefore this piece describes method and points to authoritative datasets rather than asserting a definitive state ranking not present in the cited reporting [3][4][1].