Is the 13/50 stat true?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Was this fact-check helpful?
1. Summary of the results
The overwhelming majority of analyses provided conclude that the 13/50 statistic is a myth with no basis in evidence [1] [2]. These sources argue that the statistic is often based on arrest rates, not conviction rates, and does not take into account possible acquittals, wrongful imprisonments, or unfair trials [1] [2]. Some analyses also point out that the statistic is used by white supremacists to perpetuate racist propaganda against African Americans [3]. In contrast, some Quora users claim that the 13/50 statistic is real and supported by FBI data, while others argue that it is misleading or racist [4]. However, these claims are not supported by the majority of the analyses provided.
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
A key missing context in the original statement is the definition of the 13/50 statistic and its origins [3]. Some analyses provide alternative viewpoints on the statistic, such as the idea that cultural and socioeconomic factors contribute to higher crime rates in certain communities [4]. Additionally, some sources highlight the issues of over-policing in Black communities and the lack of accountability in the justice system [2]. These alternative viewpoints suggest that the issue is more complex than a simple statistic and requires a nuanced understanding of the social and economic factors at play. For example, the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) identifies the 13/50 and 13/90 statistics as hate symbols used by white supremacists to perpetuate racist propaganda against African Americans [3].
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original statement lacks context and does not provide any evidence to support the claim about the 13/50 statistic [1] [2]. This lack of context and evidence creates a risk of misinformation and bias. The statistic is often used by white supremacists to perpetuate racist propaganda, which benefits their ideology [3]. On the other hand, debunking the 13/50 myth benefits those who seek to promote accuracy and challenge racist stereotypes [2] [1]. Overall, the original statement requires careful consideration of the potential misinformation and bias involved, as well as the alternative viewpoints and missing context that can provide a more nuanced understanding of the issue [1] [4] [2] [3].