Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: What were the key findings in the 2022 Maryland gerrymandering lawsuit?

Checked on August 26, 2025

1. Summary of the results

Based on the analyses provided, there were two distinct 2022 Maryland gerrymandering lawsuits with significant outcomes:

State-Level Congressional Map Case:

The Maryland Court of Appeals struck down the state's new congressional map as an extreme partisan gerrymander [1]. This was a major ruling that found the redistricting plan violated legal standards for fair representation. The court ordered the legislature to adopt a revised map, which was completed on March 30, 2022 [1]. The final congressional map was enacted by the General Assembly and signed into law by the Governor on April 4, 2022 [2].

Prince George's County Case:

At the county level, a Prince George's County judge ruled that the County Council failed to follow the law when approving a controversial redistricting plan [3]. The court threw out the plan, and a map crafted by a nonpartisan commission was used instead [3]. This case centered on procedural violations where the council failed to follow the law by passing a resolution instead of a bill [3].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original question lacks several important contextual elements:

  • Maryland's overall redistricting performance: The state received a C grade from Common Cause for legislative and congressional redistricting [4], indicating systemic issues beyond individual lawsuits.
  • Transparency concerns: The General Assembly's role in the process was criticized for a lack of public transparency [4], suggesting the lawsuits were part of broader accountability issues.
  • National redistricting landscape: Maryland's cases occurred within a broader context of gerrymandering lawsuits across the United States, with challenges to congressional and legislative maps in various states involving claims of partisan gerrymandering and racial discrimination [1].
  • Supreme Court influence: The legal environment was shaped by Supreme Court rulings that have given states increasingly unfettered power in redistricting and weakened the Voting Rights Act, allowing states to draw maps with the goal of entrenching their own party's power [5].

Reform recommendations: Common Cause suggested that Maryland move to an independent redistricting commission for future efforts [4], indicating that advocacy groups saw the current system as fundamentally flawed.

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question itself does not contain misinformation, but it oversimplifies the complexity of Maryland's 2022 redistricting litigation by referring to "the" lawsuit when there were actually multiple significant cases at both state and county levels. This framing could lead to incomplete understanding of the scope of gerrymandering issues in Maryland during 2022.

The question also lacks acknowledgment that these lawsuits were part of a nationwide pattern of redistricting challenges [1], which could give the impression that Maryland's issues were isolated rather than part of a broader democratic governance challenge across multiple states.

Want to dive deeper?
What were the main arguments presented in the 2022 Maryland gerrymandering lawsuit?
How did the court's decision in the 2022 Maryland gerrymandering lawsuit affect the state's congressional districts?
Which judges presided over the 2022 Maryland gerrymandering lawsuit and what were their rulings?
What role did the Maryland General Assembly play in the 2022 gerrymandering lawsuit?
How does the 2022 Maryland gerrymandering lawsuit compare to other recent redistricting cases in the US?