Were any 2024 election fraud cases prosecuted and what were the outcomes?

Checked on February 4, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Multiple criminal and civil actions touching the 2024 U.S. election were prosecuted or advanced: local prosecutors filed charges and opened investigations into alleged voter fraud, advocacy groups launched lawsuits seeking discovery, and high-profile criminal attempts to overturn 2020 results that spilled into 2024 prosecutions were ultimately dismissed after the 2024 election outcome changed legal trajectories [1] [2] [3] [4]. Many matters remain active in courts or investigatory stages, with a pattern of localized indictments but no evidence in these sources of a nationwide, election-altering fraud prosecution that changed certified 2024 results [5] [6].

1. Local charges and investigations: criminal cases filed in 2024 and 2025

State and local prosecutors pursued discrete criminal cases tied to 2024 voting: the San Luis Obispo County District Attorney filed nine charges against Gaea Edde Powell for alleged fraudulent voting and other election-related offenses tied to 2022 and 2024 municipal elections, eight of which are felonies, with arraignment procedures described by the DA’s office [2], and Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton announced investigations into 33 potential noncitizen voters and reported indictments and arrests linked to a Frio County vote-harvesting scheme [1].

2. Databases and compiled cases: sampling versus systemic proof

Conservative research groups continue to compile proven instances of election crimes—The Heritage Foundation’s Election Fraud Map lists sampled cases, including charges reported in 2024 such as a Fulton County canvassing-related indictment and other named incidents—but the database represents a curated set of proven or adjudicated instances rather than evidence of large-scale, outcome-changing fraud in 2024 [7] [5].

3. Civil suits seeking to challenge 2024 results: discovery and next steps

Civil litigation challenging 2024 results advanced in at least one notable instance: SMART Legislation’s suit in Rockland County, New York, was cleared to proceed to discovery with a judge setting timelines for document production and trial-readiness, meaning plaintiffs are gathering forensic and statistical evidence but have not yet overturned certified results [3] [6] [8].

4. High-profile prosecutions and the effect of the 2024 outcome

A pivotal dynamic in late-stage prosecutions was the 2024 presidential result’s legal impact: Special Counsel Jack Smith wrote that his evidence would have been sufficient for conviction on a federal election-interference case, but after the 2024 election that prosecution was dismissed because continuing to prosecute an elected president raised legal barriers, and Smith stood by his charging decisions [4]. This shows how prosecutorial paths for cases tied to election interference can be altered by political and constitutional events documented in the Smith report excerpt [4].

5. Broader context: rarity of voter fraud prosecutions and continued litigation landscape

Scholarly and policy reporting underscores that verified voter fraud prosecutions historically are limited in number and typically localized, a pattern reflected in 2024-era reporting and databases that find only small numbers of cases out of millions of votes cast; commentators and trackers emphasized that many election-related lawsuits and prosecutions raise rule-of-law questions even when they do not change certified outcomes [9] [10] [11].

6. Bottom line on outcomes: prosecutions occurred, but no evidence in these sources of a systemic fraud conviction overturning 2024 results

The record in the provided reporting shows multiple prosecutions, indictments, and active civil suits linked to 2024 voting—some resulting in formal charges (e.g., Powell, Texas referrals) and others proceeding through discovery—while major federal and state election-subversion prosecutions faced dismissal or legal limits after the 2024 result [2] [1] [3] [4]; none of the cited sources documents a prosecution that produced a ruling or conviction that altered certified 2024 national outcomes [6] [8].

Want to dive deeper?
Which 2024 local election fraud prosecutions resulted in convictions or plea deals and where are the official court records?
How did Special Counsel Jack Smith describe the evidence and legal limits that led to dismissal of the federal election-interference case after the 2024 election?
What are the claims and evidentiary requests in the Rockland County SMART Legislation lawsuit challenging 2024 results, and what is the court-imposed discovery timeline?