Fact check: What percentage of protesters in Los Angeles were arrested during the 2024 protests?

1. Summary of the results

Based on the available analyses, it is impossible to determine the percentage of protesters arrested during the 2024 Los Angeles protests due to insufficient data in the sources examined. While specific arrest numbers are provided in some sources, the total number of protesters is consistently missing, making percentage calculations impossible.

The sources reveal conflicting information about the scale and nature of the events:

• 203 arrests were made during the first curfew overnight Tuesday for failure to disperse, plus 17 additional arrests for curfew violations ^{[1] [2]}
• More than a dozen people have been charged with various crimes related to the protests ^[3]
• One source references over 1,000 rioters being involved, though without corresponding arrest data ^[4]

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original question lacks crucial context about which specific 2024 protests are being referenced, as Los Angeles experienced multiple protest events throughout the year. The sources analyzed focus on immigration-related protests that involved confrontations with ICE officers ^{[4] [3]}.

Key missing information includes:

• Total number of protesters participating in the events
• Clear timeline and duration of the protests
• Distinction between peaceful protesters and those engaged in violent activities
• Comparison with arrest rates from other similar protests

The framing varies significantly between sources: some describe participants as "rioters" who assaulted federal officers ^[4], while others use more neutral terms like "protesters" ^{[1] [2]}. This linguistic difference suggests different perspectives on the nature of the events.

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question assumes that a specific, calculable percentage exists, which may be misleading given that the available data does not support such a calculation. The question's framing as a straightforward statistical inquiry overlooks the complexity of categorizing participants and the lack of comprehensive data collection during chaotic events.

The question also fails to distinguish between different types of arrests (failure to disperse vs. criminal charges) or different categories of participants (peaceful protesters vs. those engaged in violence). Government agencies and law enforcement would benefit from presenting higher arrest percentages to demonstrate effective crowd control, while civil rights organizations would benefit from lower percentages to argue against excessive enforcement.

The absence of total protester counts in official sources ^{[1] [4] [3] [2]} suggests either inadequate data collection or selective reporting that makes transparent accountability difficult to achieve.