Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: How did early voting, mail-in ballots, and Election Day turnout each contribute to the overall 2024 turnout?
Executive Summary
The 2024 presidential election produced exceptionally high participation, with roughly 153 million ballots cast and turnout close to 2020’s record, driven largely by a surge in early in-person voting and substantial mail-in/absentee totals nationwide [1] [2] [3]. More than half of votes were cast before Election Day, shifting how campaigns targeted voters and producing notable partisan dynamics: Republicans pushed early turnout aggressively and benefitted in several swing states even as Democrats emphasized mail and early in-person voting in some jurisdictions [4] [3] [5]. Federal and academic tallies show mail voting’s share fell relative to early in-person ballots, while early voting overall rose, creating a mixed picture where modality, timing, and state rules together shaped the final turnout story [6] [7] [3].
1. What people claimed loudly and often — the headline claims from the record books
Multiple analyses claimed that total turnout in 2024 neared 2020’s historic level, with about 153 million ballots cast, and that turnout in swing states exceeded national averages, aiding the eventual Republican victories in those states [1] [2]. Observers also asserted that more than half the electorate voted before Election Day, with campaigns intentionally pushing early participation to mobilize infrequent voters; this claim appears in contemporaneous reporting and campaign statements [4] [5]. Another frequent claim is that mail-voting’s share declined while early in-person voting increased, based on federal reports and state-level compilations that separate mail ballots from early in-person returns [6] [3]. These claims form the basic narrative: high turnout, front-loaded voting, and modality shifts that varied by state and party [3] [7].
2. The hard numbers — how many voted early, by mail, and on Election Day?
National datasets compiled by academics and federal agencies show about 88.4 million ballots were cast by mail or early in-person as of post-election tallies, with battleground states accounting for roughly 65.7 million early requests or returns, underscoring the scale of pre–Election Day participation [3]. A federal report summarized that mail voting represented roughly 30.3% of turnout, while early in-person voting rose substantially, and overall citizen voting age participation hit about 65% in the general election — a very high engagement level historically [6]. Parallel tracking from university labs recorded early voting totals surpassing 2012 and 2016 early-vote levels, and exit-poll style breakdowns showed early ballots being cast by a mix of registered Democrats (41%), Republicans (38%), and others (21%), suggesting neither party monopolized early modalities nationally [7] [3].
3. Who gained — the partisan implications and contested interpretations
Multiple outlets concluded that Republicans benefited from high turnout in 2024, a finding that upends some conventional expectations that turnout surges favor Democrats; analysts tied this to GOP efforts to turn out infrequent and early voters, and to stronger performance in seven swing states where turnout outpaced the national average [4] [1]. At the same time, data show substantial Democratic early-mail and early-in-person activity, with campaign efforts urging early voting and strong early participation among Democratic constituencies in some states [3] [5]. Academic tracking emphasized that early voting is used by both parties, and the distribution of mail vs. in-person early ballots varied dramatically by state law, ballot-request rules, and partisan mobilization, meaning national partisan takeaways can be true in aggregate while differing locally [7] [6].
4. State-level detail changes the headline — geography, rules, and timing mattered
State-by-state reporting reveals that the balance between mail and early in-person voting depended on election law and administrative practices: some states that curtailed universal mail ballot access saw mail shares decline, while early in-person windows expanded in others, concentrating pre–Election Day turnout [6] [3]. Swing-state dynamics amplified the electoral impact: higher turnout in those seven battlegrounds correlated with Republican wins there, even as national totals showed a nearly even partisan split among early ballots; this underscores that where voters cast early matters more than the national mode mix [1] [3]. University and media trackers documented the timing of returns and backlogs in counting, noting that some late-arriving mail ballots and provisional verifications prolonged final tallies, emphasizing procedural variability across states [7] [2].
5. What remains unsettled — data gaps, timing, and the lessons for future elections
Analysts caution that differences in how states report “early” and “mail” ballots, the lag in certifying ballots, and post-election reconciliations create interpretive gaps, so headline percentages may shift as audits and official canvasses conclude [7] [6]. Polling and election-lab compilations largely agree on the core facts — high overall turnout, a majority voting before Election Day, and a decrease in mail’s share offset by increased early in-person votes — but they diverge on the magnitude of partisan advantage and how much of the result is attributable to timing versus demographic shifts, making nuanced, state-by-state study essential [4] [5] [2]. Future reporting should prioritize standardized state-level breakdowns of modality and date-of-vote to turn these provisional narratives into definitive, comparable evidence [6] [3].