Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: What cybersecurity measures protected voting machines during the 2024 election?
1. Summary of the results
Multiple layers of cybersecurity measures were implemented during the 2024 election, including:
- Paper confirmation slips and authentication processes [1]
- Isolation of critical systems from the internet
- Secured storage devices for data transfer
- Access logs and private networks
- Physical security measures like tamper-evident seals [2]
- Approximately 98% of ballots had a paper record for verification [2]
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
Several critical security concerns emerged that the question doesn't address:
- Unauthorized access to voting system software occurred in multiple states including Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Nevada, and Colorado by allies of former President Trump [3]
- These breaches affected equipment from companies that count over 70% of votes nationwide [3]
- While vulnerabilities exist, there have been no confirmed cases of systematic vote switching [1]
Important institutional context:
CISA (Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency) has been actively involved in election security since 2017 by:
- Designating election infrastructure as critical infrastructure
- Creating a cyber defense toolkit
- Offering free services to state/local governments
- Maintaining an Elections Infrastructure Information Sharing and Analysis Center (EI-ISAC) [4]
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The question assumes cybersecurity measures were effective and comprehensive, while evidence suggests significant vulnerabilities:
- Unauthorized access could have allowed malicious actors to:
- Identify system vulnerabilities
- Practice election interference techniques
- Potentially fabricate evidence of tampering [3]
Who benefits from different narratives:
- Election equipment manufacturers benefit from emphasizing their security measures
- Political actors might benefit from either:
- Highlighting vulnerabilities to question election integrity
- Emphasizing security measures to maintain public trust
- Federal agencies like CISA benefit from demonstrating their protective role in election security [4]