Fact check: How many voting machine lawsuits were dismissed versus upheld in 2024?

1. Summary of the results

Based on the provided analyses, there is limited comprehensive data to provide a complete answer to the question about voting machine lawsuits dismissed versus upheld in 2024. The sources reveal:

Dismissed Cases:

• One confirmed dismissal in Georgia where a federal judge dismissed a lawsuit challenging the state's electronic voting machine system, despite maintaining "substantial concerns" about the system's security ^{[1] [2] [3]}. The judge ruled that plaintiffs failed to demonstrate the system disenfranchised them from exercising their right to vote.

Ongoing/Advancing Cases:

• At least one lawsuit is proceeding in Rockland County, New York, brought by SMART Legislation, which seeks a full hand recount of Presidential and U.S. Senate races due to voting irregularities ^{[4] [5] [6] [7] [8]}. A Supreme Court Judge has ordered discovery to proceed in this case.

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original question assumes a comprehensive tracking system exists for voting machine lawsuits in 2024, but the analyses reveal significant gaps in available data:

• No centralized database appears to track all voting machine-related litigation nationwide
• Different stakeholders benefit from different narratives about election security:
• Election officials and voting machine companies like Dominion benefit from maintaining public confidence in electronic voting systems
• Election security advocates benefit from highlighting vulnerabilities to push for paper ballot systems
• Political parties may selectively emphasize cases that support their preferred voting methods
• Geographic limitations in the data - the analyses focus primarily on Georgia and New York cases, leaving 43 other states unexamined
• Timing considerations - some cases may still be pending resolution, making a definitive count premature

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question contains an implicit assumption that comprehensive data exists on all voting machine lawsuits filed and resolved in 2024. This assumption may be misleading because:

• No evidence suggests a systematic tracking mechanism exists for such cases across all jurisdictions ^{[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [9] [6] [7] [8]}
• The question's framing as a simple "dismissed versus upheld" binary oversimplifies the legal landscape, as evidenced by the Georgia case where the judge dismissed the lawsuit while simultaneously expressing "substantial concerns" about voting system security ^{[1] [2] [3]}
• Statistical anomalies and ongoing investigations mentioned in the New York case ^[8] suggest that some election challenges involve complex technical issues that may not fit neatly into traditional legal categories

The question may inadvertently perpetuate the misconception that voting machine litigation outcomes can be easily quantified and compared, when the reality appears far more nuanced and geographically fragmented.