Fact check: Was the 2025 military parade approved back in 2024 by the Biden admin

1. Summary of the results

Based on the available analyses, there is limited evidence regarding the Biden administration's approval of the 2025 military parade. The most relevant information comes from one source which indicates that the U.S. Army filed a permit on June 12, 2024, for a modest event to celebrate its 250th birthday, which was initially planned under the Biden administration ^[1]. However, this source does not explicitly confirm that the Biden administration formally approved the 2025 military parade.

The other sources either focus on unrelated topics such as the Defense Budget for Fiscal Year 2025 ^[2], describe the parade atmosphere without addressing approval details ^[3], or discuss entirely different matters like investigations into Biden's cognitive health ^{[4] [5]}. One source mentions that President Donald J. Trump will join the celebration, implying the event is taking place during his presidency ^[6], which suggests the parade occurred after the transition of power.

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The analyses reveal significant gaps in the available information about the parade's approval process. Key missing context includes:

• The distinction between initial planning and formal approval - while the Army filed a permit in 2024 ^[1], this doesn't necessarily constitute Biden administration approval
• The transformation of the event - the sources suggest the parade evolved from a "modest event" initially planned under Biden to what appears to be a larger celebration under Trump
• Timeline clarity - the sources don't clearly establish when formal approval occurred or whether the Biden administration's involvement extended beyond the initial Army permit filing

Alternative viewpoints that could benefit different parties:

• Military contractors and defense industry would benefit from promoting the narrative that military parades demonstrate strong defense spending and readiness
• Political figures from both parties could use the parade's origins to claim credit or assign blame depending on public reception
• Trump administration officials might benefit from emphasizing their role in the final execution while downplaying Biden-era planning

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question assumes a definitive approval by the Biden administration that is not clearly supported by the available evidence. The question's framing suggests certainty about Biden administration approval when the sources only indicate that the U.S. Army filed a permit under the Biden administration ^[1], which represents preliminary planning rather than executive approval.

The question also lacks important temporal context - it doesn't acknowledge that the parade ultimately took place under the Trump administration, with President Trump joining the celebration ^[6]. This omission could lead to confusion about which administration was responsible for the final event versus its initial conception.

The binary nature of the question (was it "approved" or not) oversimplifies what appears to be a complex transition process where initial planning began under one administration but final execution occurred under another.